who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我们要举行一个辩论比赛题目就是who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我没有辩论经验 第一次参加辩论 想让大家集思广益一

who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我们要举行一个辩论比赛题目就是who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我没有辩论经验 第一次参加辩论 想让大家集思广益一
who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?
我们要举行一个辩论比赛题目就是who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我没有辩论经验 第一次参加辩论 想让大家集思广益一下找找论据~正反方的都要!因为最后才决定谁是正反方,请大家写清楚是支持friendly teacher 还是 strict teacher!请尽量多写!如果有怎样去反驳别人的论据更好!

who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我们要举行一个辩论比赛题目就是who would you respect more,a friendly teacher or a strict teacher?我没有辩论经验 第一次参加辩论 想让大家集思广益一
给你点素材:“师道尊严的负面影响"

“绝对的权力的教师”在中国传统文化

1.严格的教师所产生的优秀学生
为什么“严师”德高望重吗?在传统的文化背景下,“严师”是集中精神.有一种说法,"一个严格的老师发生突出学生的“最重要的标准来衡量一名教师.它是不同的要求教师在现代社会.尽管我们希望老师对学生严格要求,设置,我们将永远坚持“严”是最重要的,主要的标准.也许在现代社会中,我们几乎不可能理解古代人民的思想.如果你是在古代人民的鞋,你会明白他们的“严师”的情况下在这样的社会环境.在古代,生产力很低,信息交流、文化传播渠道也是有限的.知识是由一群特许专营学习者——比如学士和官员.所以他们共享和传播知识.一般人要学习知识,唯一的方法就是把它们看作是教师,按照他们的教导.“严”是一种表现的霸权.在历史上,我们不难发现,较低的水平,更严重的社会生产力的垄断.在现代社会中,在特定的信息时代,信息交流、文化传播渠道,极大地丰富了.人们也可以轻易获得知识的无教师.因此,从破裂的霸权垄断,老师也不断地消失了.“严师”一定能坚持绝对权威的教师.

2.一位老师一天是一个父亲一辈子
在漫长的历史,尊重教师被认为是中华民族的优秀传统.教师主导在教育过程中.从理论上说,一旦学生尊敬的老师之一,他们会遵守他所有的生命,并把他看作自己的父亲.我们把教师的“天地君、和他们的父母”.几乎每个人都绝对的崇拜.所以很容易发现有尊严的老师是高的.这使很多人错误地认为我们的国家尊重老师.然而,在现代社会中,教师的尊严,嘲笑奚落,无情的践踏.所以我不得不重新考虑这个真实的态度,中国给予老师.答案是“这本书的仪式:学习”.有句:知识是好注意规定,所有的老师都尊重学生,最后,所有的人都追求知识.事实上,最终的目标是学习知道王”、“教师让人们知道”,目的是什么?有统治阶级已经认识到它的重要性”,提高行业整体素质教育”在那些日子吗?我不这么认为.答案是“教师让人们知道”.所以人们学习知识,事实上,它指的是“礼貌.”“礼”是一个等级秩序,一个工具,以维持其统治阶级统治.中国的社会是建立在社会道德的遗传基础.维持正常运行的国家政治和道德是巨大的伦理秩序.”礼貌“是一套规范和标准,维护国家机器操作有效.最终的目标是统治阶级是为了让人们学会这些程序,适应这样的规范,并同意这种想法.最后,最终死于游戏的规则.当然,作为一种动态的人不会轻易屈服于它,所以,人们应该怎么做?这就要求教师具有绝对的权力控制的学生.认真、严谨的态度,严重的传播这种想法推广,使人愚蠢.在前面的所谓的“教学”,人们的道德的敬畏.因此,统治阶级达到目的.由此我们可以看出,“老师”是统治阶级的工具,维护法治的国家.“老师”作为一个单独的垄断知识课的特别工作小组,专门负责教育的人.完成指定的任务及灌输的统治阶级,我们必须给教师一个适当的状况作为担保.如果没有合适的地位,为教师,学生们会问:为什么我要听老师的话,他说一定要合适吗?然后统治阶级蒙蔽了人们通过教师.如果他们不这样做,他们的优势就会受到威胁.因此,“老师”,被送进了“天、地、君主,家长伦理行列.”所以,这是没有问题的,学生应该尊敬老师.给你点素材：“师道尊严的负面影响”
B． “The Absolute Authority of the Teachers” in Chinese Traditional Culture
1. A Strict Teacher Produces Outstanding Students
Why was the “strict teacher” highly respected? In the traditional cultural context, the “strict teacher” was paid good attention to. There is a saying “A strict teacher produces outstanding students” which has been the most important standard to measure a teacher. It is different from the demands of the teachers in modern society. Although we want the teachers to set strict demands on students, we will never hold that being “strict” is the most important and main criteria. Maybe in modern society, it is almost impossible for us to understand the ideas of ancient people. If you were in the shoes of the ancient people, you would understand their “strict teacher’s” circumstances in such social environment. In ancient times, productive forces was very low, the exchange of information, and cultural transmission channels were also limited. Knowledge was monopolized by a handful of privileged learners--such as bachelors and officials. So they shared and transmitted knowledge. The ordinary people wanted to learn knowledge; the only way was to regard them as teachers, by following their teachings. "Strict" is a manifestation of hegemony. Throughout history, we can easily find that the lower level of social productivity, the more serious the monopoly was. In modern society, in the particular information age, information exchanges and cultural dissemination channels have greatly enriched. People can also acquire knowledge easily without teachers. Therefore, since the breakup of monopoly, the hegemony of teachers has also constantly faded. A “strict teacher” is bound to uphold the absolute authority of the teachers.
2. A Teacher for a Day is a Father for a Lifetime
In the long Chinese history, respecting teachers was considered as the fine tradition of Chinese nation. Teachers dominated in the process of education. Theoretically, once students respected one as their teacher, they would obey him all the life, and treat him like their own father. We take teachers into the sequence of “Heaven and Earth, Monarch, and Parents”. Almost everyone absolutely worships it. So it’s easy to discover that the dignity of the teacher is high. These made many people mistakenly believe that our nation respect teachers from the heart. However, in modern society, the dignity of teachers has been mercilessly trampled, ridiculed, scoffed. So I have to rethink the true attitude that the Chinese pay to teachers. The answer is in "The Book of Rites: Learning ". There is a sentence: The knowledge is given good attention to provided that all teachers are respected by students, and at last all people will pursue the knowledge. In fact, with the ultimate goal of “learning to know King”, and “teachers make people know", what is the purpose? Have the ruling class been aware of the importance of “overall improvement in the quality education” in those days? I don’t think so. The answer is in "teachers make people know" .So the people learn knowledge, in fact, it refers to "politeness." “Politeness” was a hierarchical order, a tool for the ruling class to maintain its rule. Chinese society was built on the genetic basis of social ethics. To maintain the normal operation of the country was huge ethical political and ethical order. “Politeness” was a set of norms and standards, maintaining the state machine operating effectively. The ultimate goal of the ruling class was to make people learn such procedures, adapted to such norms, and agreed to this thinking. Finally, people eventually succumbed to the rule. Of course, as a dynamic individual who would not easily succumb to it, so how should people do? This would call for teachers having the absolute authority to control the students. Severe, serious, rigorous attitudes promote the dissemination of this idea, and make the people stupid. In front of the so-called “teaching morality”, people were full of awe. Thus, the ruling class achieved the purpose. From this we can see that the "teacher” was the tool of the ruling class safeguarding the rule of the country. "Teacher" as a separate class from the monopoly of knowledge of the special working group dedicated to educating people. To accomplish their assigned tasks and inculcate the ruling class, we must give teachers a proper status as a guarantee. If there were no suitable status for teachers, the students would question: Why do I have to listen to teachers, what he has said will be certainly right? Then the ruling class hoodwinked people through teachers. If they don’t do like that, their dominant position would be threatened. Therefore, the “teacher” was taken into the “heaven, earth, monarch, and parent ethics ranks.” So, it’s out of the question that students should respect teacher.

给你点素材：“师道尊严的负面影响”
B． “The Absolute Authority of the Teachers” in Chinese Traditional Culture
1. A Strict Teacher Produces Outstanding Students
Why was the “strict teacher” highly respected...

全部展开

给你点素材：“师道尊严的负面影响”
B． “The Absolute Authority of the Teachers” in Chinese Traditional Culture
1. A Strict Teacher Produces Outstanding Students
Why was the “strict teacher” highly respected? In the traditional cultural context, the “strict teacher” was paid good attention to. There is a saying “A strict teacher produces outstanding students” which has been the most important standard to measure a teacher. It is different from the demands of the teachers in modern society. Although we want the teachers to set strict demands on students, we will never hold that being “strict” is the most important and main criteria. Maybe in modern society, it is almost impossible for us to understand the ideas of ancient people. If you were in the shoes of the ancient people, you would understand their “strict teacher’s” circumstances in such social environment. In ancient times, productive forces was very low, the exchange of information, and cultural transmission channels were also limited. Knowledge was monopolized by a handful of privileged learners--such as bachelors and officials. So they shared and transmitted knowledge. The ordinary people wanted to learn knowledge; the only way was to regard them as teachers, by following their teachings. "Strict" is a manifestation of hegemony. Throughout history, we can easily find that the lower level of social productivity, the more serious the monopoly was. In modern society, in the particular information age, information exchanges and cultural dissemination channels have greatly enriched. People can also acquire knowledge easily without teachers. Therefore, since the breakup of monopoly, the hegemony of teachers has also constantly faded. A “strict teacher” is bound to uphold the absolute authority of the teachers.
2. A Teacher for a Day is a Father for a Lifetime
In the long Chinese history, respecting teachers was considered as the fine tradition of Chinese nation. Teachers dominated in the process of education. Theoretically, once students respected one as their teacher, they would obey him all the life, and treat him like their own father. We take teachers into the sequence of “Heaven and Earth, Monarch, and Parents”. Almost everyone absolutely worships it. So it’s easy to discover that the dignity of the teacher is high. These made many people mistakenly believe that our nation respect teachers from the heart. However, in modern society, the dignity of teachers has been mercilessly trampled, ridiculed, scoffed. So I have to rethink the true attitude that the Chinese pay to teachers. The answer is in "The Book of Rites: Learning ". There is a sentence: The knowledge is given good attention to provided that all teachers are respected by students, and at last all people will pursue the knowledge. In fact, with the ultimate goal of “learning to know King”, and “teachers make people know", what is the purpose? Have the ruling class been aware of the importance of “overall improvement in the quality education” in those days? I don’t think so. The answer is in "teachers make people know" .So the people learn knowledge, in fact, it refers to "politeness." “Politeness” was a hierarchical order, a tool for the ruling class to maintain its rule. Chinese society was built on the genetic basis of social ethics. To maintain the normal operation of the country was huge ethical political and ethical order. “Politeness” was a set of norms and standards, maintaining the state machine operating effectively. The ultimate goal of the ruling class was to make people learn such procedures, adapted to such norms, and agreed to this thinking. Finally, people eventually succumbed to the rule. Of course, as a dynamic individual who would not easily succumb to it, so how should people do? This would call for teachers having the absolute authority to control the students. Severe, serious, rigorous attitudes promote the dissemination of this idea, and make the people stupid. In front of the so-called “teaching morality”, people were full of awe. Thus, the ruling class achieved the purpose. From this we can see that the "teacher” was the tool of the ruling class safeguarding the rule of the country. "Teacher" as a separate class from the monopoly of knowledge of the special working group dedicated to educating people. To accomplish their assigned tasks and inculcate the ruling class, we must give teachers a proper status as a guarantee. If there were no suitable status for teachers, the students would question: Why do I have to listen to teachers, what he has said will be certainly right? Then the ruling class hoodwinked people through teachers. If they don’t do like that, their dominant position would be threatened. Therefore, the “teacher” was taken into the “heaven, earth, monarch, and parent ethics ranks.” So, it’s out of the question that students should respect teacher.

收起

我本身是辩论队的，帮你提出几点，言简意赅：
反方：
1.严师出高徒 （辩驳，师傅领进门修行在个人）
2.学生处于可塑时期需要严格的老师帮助我们成长 （可塑期也是叛逆期，过于严厉会适得其反）
3.老师的真正含义，是传道授业，治学当严谨。（朋友式老师也会传道授业，比如季羡林）
4.
正方：
1.人性化教育，亲和力第一 （严格不是死板不是恪守，...

全部展开

我本身是辩论队的，帮你提出几点，言简意赅：
反方：
1.严师出高徒 （辩驳，师傅领进门修行在个人）
2.学生处于可塑时期需要严格的老师帮助我们成长 （可塑期也是叛逆期，过于严厉会适得其反）
3.老师的真正含义，是传道授业，治学当严谨。（朋友式老师也会传道授业，比如季羡林）
4.
正方：
1.人性化教育，亲和力第一 （严格不是死板不是恪守，而是严谨的态度）
2.朋友式的老师能温和的引导我们。（一个严谨的老师同样能在我们的学习生涯中有很大帮助）
3朋友式导师更能让我们亲近学到更多的东西 （我们不能否认很多严谨的老师带出许多优秀的学生，如我们身边的老师就可以举你们专业的老师嘛。这样的人很多）

收起