能帮我翻译吗?BUSINESS LAWStrict LiabilityUnder the doctrine of strict liability,it is not necessary to prove a negligent act on the part of the manufacturer or seller when someone is injured by a defective product.strict liability is a legal t

能帮我翻译吗?BUSINESS LAWStrict LiabilityUnder the doctrine of strict liability,it is not necessary to prove a negligent act on the part of the manufacturer or seller when someone is injured by a defective product.strict liability is a legal t
能帮我翻译吗?BUSINESS LAW
Strict Liability
Under the doctrine of strict liability,it is not necessary to prove a negligent act on the part of the manufacturer or seller when someone is injured by a defective product.strict liability is a legal theory,adopted by two-thirds of the states,which imposes liability on manufacturers or suppliers for selling goods that are unreasonably dangerous,without regard to fault or negligence.The principal consideration under the doctrine of strict liability is the safety of the product,not the conduct of the manufacturer or supplier of the goods.Under this rule of law,manufacturers have the duty to design reasonably safe products.They must also give proper instrutions for the product’s use and provide warnings of possible danger.
It is difficult to recover damages under the strict liability doctrine.People who are injured or who suffer property damage from a defective product may recover from the manufacturer or seller only if they can prove all of the following:The manufacturer or seller sold the product in a defective condition;the manufacturer or seller was engaged in the business of selling the product;the product was unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer;the defective condition was the proximate cause of the injury or damage;the defective condition existed at the time it left the hands of the manufacturer or seller;and the consumption of the product.

能帮我翻译吗?BUSINESS LAWStrict LiabilityUnder the doctrine of strict liability,it is not necessary to prove a negligent act on the part of the manufacturer or seller when someone is injured by a defective product.strict liability is a legal t
严格法律责任
根据学说的严格法律责任,这是没有必要,以证明疏忽行为对部分的制造商或卖方,当有人受伤,由一个有缺陷的product.strict责任是一种法律理论,通过有三分之二的国家,这施加法律责任的制造商或供应商出售的货物,是不合理的危险,而不理会故障或negligence.the的主要考虑下,学说的严格法律责任,是安全的产品,而不是进行制造商或供应商的goods.under这法治,制造商有责任去设计合理的安全products.they也必须给予适当instrutions为产品的使用,并提供警告可能的危险.
这是难以收回的赔偿,根据严格的法律责任doctrine.people谁是谁受伤或遭受财产损失的,从有缺陷的产品可能会收回从制造商或卖方只,如果他们能证明所有有关下列各点：制造商或卖方出售的产品在一有缺陷的状况;制造商或卖方,从事的业务出售产品;该产品是不合理的危险,向用户或消费者;缺陷的状况是近因的伤害或损坏;缺陷的状况存在的时间,离开了手中的制造商或卖方;和消费产品.