A few common misconceptions.Beauty is only skin deep.One's physical assets and liabilities don't count all that much in a managerial career.A woman should always try to look her best.Over the last 30 years,social scientists have conducted more than 1

A few common misconceptions.Beauty is only skin deep.One's physical assets and liabilities don't count all that much in a managerial career.A woman should always try to look her best.Over the last 30 years,social scientists have conducted more than 1
A few common misconceptions.Beauty is only skin deep.One's physical assets and liabilities don't count all that much in a managerial career.A woman should always try to look her best.
Over the last 30 years,social scientists have conducted more than 1,000 studies of how we react to beautiful and not so beautiful people.The virtually unanimous conclusion:Looks do matter,more than most of us realize.The data suggest,for example,that physically attractive individuals are more likely to be treated well by their parents,sought out as friends,and pursued romantically.With the possible exception of women seeking managerial jobs,they are also more likely to be hired,paid well,and promoted.Once again,the scientists have caught us mouthing pieties(虔诚) while acting just the contrary.Their typical experiment works something like this.They give each member of a group —college students,or teachers or corporate personnel mangers—a piece of paper relating an individual's accomplishments.Attached to the paper is a photograph.While the papers all say exactly the same thing the pictures are different.Some show a strikingly attractive person,some an average-looking character,and some an unusually unattractive human being.Group members are asked to rate the individual on certain attributes,anything from personal warmth to the likelihood that he or she will be promoted.Almost invariably,the better looking the person in the picture,the higher the person is rated.In the phrase,borrowed from Sappho,that the social scientists use to sum up the common perception,what is beautiful is good.
In business,however,good looks cut both ways for women,and deeper than for men.A Utah State University professor,who is an authority on the subject,explains:In terms of their careers,the impact of physical attractiveness on males is only modest.But its potential impact on females can be tremendous,making it easier,for example,for the more attractive to get jobs where they are in the public eye.On another note,though,there is enough literature now for us to conclude that attractive women who aspire(追求) to managerial positions do not g et on as well as women who may be less attractive.

A few common misconceptions.Beauty is only skin deep.One's physical assets and liabilities don't count all that much in a managerial career.A woman should always try to look her best.Over the last 30 years,social scientists have conducted more than 1
几个常见的误解.美丽只是肤浅的.一个人的身体资产和负债不几个常见的误解.美丽只是肤浅的.一个人的身体资产和负债多少,先别数的管理生涯.一个女人应该一直试着去看她的长处.
在过去的30多年来,社会科学家进行了1000多名的研究的反应,而不那么漂亮的人.事实上得出一致的结论:看来做的事,比我们大多数人认为的.数据显示,例如,外表迷人的个人更容易被他们的父母,好朋友寻求、追赶浪漫.如果除去妇女的交友管理工作,他们也更倾向于被录取,报酬丰厚,、相互促进、共同发展.再一次,科学家们已经赶上了我们虔诚东侧说),而只是行动(与此相反.他们有代表性的实验作品这样的事.他们给群体的每一成员-college学生还是教师或公司人员有关mangers-a一张纸个人的成就.附在纸是一张照片.当报纸都说一模一样的事情图片是不同的.一些图片展示明显吸引你的人,有一长相普通但彬彬有礼的角色,和一些不寻常的不太引人注意的人.团队的成员有被要求对个人在某些属性,任何东西,从贴身保暖的可能性,他或她将被提拔.几乎无一例外的人,更帅的图景,更高的人评头论足.在短语,借用了Sappho,社会科学家们用总结的共同认知,美即是好.
在商业中,不过,很好的看起来减少两种方式更深的女性,是人.一个犹他州大学教授,谁是权威方面主题,说明:自己的职业生涯的影响对男性身体的吸引力只有谦虚.但它的