英语翻译Coming to the subject of my paper,it is obvious that law has some experienceregarding the inclusion of science and the public in institutional arrangements,especially in decision-making procedures.I will focus in this paper on scientific

英语翻译Coming to the subject of my paper,it is obvious that law has some experienceregarding the inclusion of science and the public in institutional arrangements,especially in decision-making procedures.I will focus in this paper on scientific
英语翻译
Coming to the subject of my paper,it is obvious that law has some experienceregarding the inclusion of science and the public in institutional arrangements,especially in decision-making procedures.I will focus in this paper on scientific advice,and will in particular deal with risk decisions.Risk decisionmaking represents a good field of reference for the above mentioned institutional arrangements as we are confronted by a combination of science,politics,law,economy and the public.It enables us to mark some of the adverse effectsto be observed when coupling different societal subsystems and the consequences which could be drawn from this.Scientific knowledge is by definitioncharacterized by uncertainty,which causes specific problems for the legalsystem as well as science in being part of the decision-making process andincluding the public also is all but an easy task,as will be shown.I will begin with some remarks concerning science and the public (II.),thenshow what risk decisions are about – particularly dealing with the repercussions scientific uncertainty has for legal approaches (III.) – and then I willaddress inclusion of the public (IV.) Arguing in favor of more differentiationand a subsequent recombination in the procedures I will particularly use theexample of the deliberate release directive of EU as a background to describethe way in which science and public are arranged within legal procedures andwhat might be drawn from it (V.)

英语翻译Coming to the subject of my paper,it is obvious that law has some experienceregarding the inclusion of science and the public in institutional arrangements,especially in decision-making procedures.I will focus in this paper on scientific
我的论文的主题,这是显而易见的法律一些experienceregarding的制度安排纳入科学和公众,尤其是在决策程序.科学建议在本文中,我将重点将风险决策特别处理.风险决策是一个良好的参考上述我们所面临的制度安排相结合的科学,政治,法律,经济和公众领域.它使我们标记耦合可以来自不同的社会子系统和后果时,观察一些的不利effectsto的.科学知识是由definitioncharacterized的不确定性,从而导致特定问题的legalsystem以及科学的决策过程andincluding公众亦是所有,但一个简单的任务的一部分,将shown.I将开始与一些言论关于科学和公众（白介素）,thenshow风险决策是什么 - 尤其是处理与科学上的不确定性具有法律办法（III.）的反响 - 然后我willaddress列入公众（IV.）争论,转而采用更加随后重组的程序,我会特别欧盟,作为背景describethe方式,科学和公众都安排在法定程序andwhat故意释放指令使用theexample differentiationand可能来自（五）

大概如下：
来我的论文的主题，这是明显的，法律对于科学的夹杂物和制度安排的公众的一些经验，尤其是在决策程序。我将在本文中对科学的建议，将特别处理风险的决定。风险决策是参考的好场对上述制度安排是我们面临的科学组合，政治，法律，经济和公共。它使我们能够标记的不利作用被观察到不同的社会子系统的耦合，可以从这个后果。科学知识被定义为特征的不确定性，导致特定问题的制度以及在决策过程中的公共部分科学也...

全部展开

大概如下：
来我的论文的主题，这是明显的，法律对于科学的夹杂物和制度安排的公众的一些经验，尤其是在决策程序。我将在本文中对科学的建议，将特别处理风险的决定。风险决策是参考的好场对上述制度安排是我们面临的科学组合，政治，法律，经济和公共。它使我们能够标记的不利作用被观察到不同的社会子系统的耦合，可以从这个后果。科学知识被定义为特征的不确定性，导致特定问题的制度以及在决策过程中的公共部分科学也几乎是一个简单的任务，将显示。我将开始与一些言论有关科学和公众展示什么风险决策是关于–特别处理随着反响科学不确定性具有法律途径–然后我将广告服饰包含公共支持更多的表现在程序的后续重组我会特别使用欧盟的故意释放指令实例为背景，描述方式，科学和公众都安排在法律程序又可以得出从它

收起