英语翻译After what is described in the AAA’s News Bulletin as a “lengthy discussion” of the Morgan case at the annual AAA business meeting (by three hundred nonvoting members and ninety-three voting fellows),the Council passed a motion reso

英语翻译After what is described in the AAA’s News Bulletin as a “lengthy discussion” of the Morgan case at the annual AAA business meeting (by three hundred nonvoting members and ninety-three voting fellows),the Council passed a motion reso
英语翻译
After what is described in the AAA’s News Bulletin as a “lengthy discussion” of the Morgan case at the annual AAA business meeting (by three hundred nonvoting members and ninety-three voting fellows),the Council passed a motion resolving “that the American Anthropological Association go on record as favoring investigation by the Executive Board in cases where the civil rights,academic freedom and professional status of anthropologists as such have been invaded,and take action where it is apparent that injustice has resulted that affects their rights as citizens and scientists,and be it further resolved that the Executive Board appoint a Committee on Scientific Freedom which shall submit for consideration by the Council at its next meeting recommendations as to what action (publication of the facts,etc.) shall be taken in such cases”.

英语翻译After what is described in the AAA’s News Bulletin as a “lengthy discussion” of the Morgan case at the annual AAA business meeting (by three hundred nonvoting members and ninety-three voting fellows),the Council passed a motion reso
在说明什么是主要的新闻公报作为“冗长的讨论”的摩根在年度级商务会议（由三百的无投票权的成员和九十三个投票人）,委员会通过了一项议案,解决“美国人类学协会继续记录有利于调查执行董事会通过的情况下,民事学术自由的权利,和专业地位的人类学家因此受到入侵,并采取行动,这是明显的不公平,影响了他们作为公民的权利和科学家,并进一步解决,执行董事会任命一个委员会科学自由,应提交理事会考虑在其下一次会议的建议什么行动（出版的事实,等）应被接受此类案件”.

在说明什么是主要的新闻公报作为“冗长的讨论”的摩根在年度级商务会议（由三百的无投票权的成员和九十三个投票人），委员会通过了一项议案，解决“美国人类学协会继续记录有利于调查执行董事会通过的情况下，民事学术自由的权利，和专业地位的人类学家因此受到入侵，并采取行动，这是明显的不公平，影响了他们作为公民的权利和科学家，并进一步解决，执行董事会任命一个委员会科学自由，应提交理事会考虑在其下一次会议的建议什么...

全部展开

在说明什么是主要的新闻公报作为“冗长的讨论”的摩根在年度级商务会议（由三百的无投票权的成员和九十三个投票人），委员会通过了一项议案，解决“美国人类学协会继续记录有利于调查执行董事会通过的情况下，民事学术自由的权利，和专业地位的人类学家因此受到入侵，并采取行动，这是明显的不公平，影响了他们作为公民的权利和科学家，并进一步解决，执行董事会任命一个委员会科学自由，应提交理事会考虑在其下一次会议的建议什么行动（出版的事实，等）应被接受此类案件”。

收起