If it were not for literature,the well known writer J.K.Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.为什么用would have gone 不是对现在情况的虚拟么 A could go B must go C would have gone D should have gone 解析是说对过去情况的假
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：六六作业网 时间：2024/12/18 11:28:15
If it were not for literature,the well known writer J.K.Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.为什么用would have gone 不是对现在情况的虚拟么 A could go B must go C would have gone D should have gone 解析是说对过去情况的假
If it were not for literature,the well known writer J.K.Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.
为什么用would have gone 不是对现在情况的虚拟么 A could go B must go C would have gone D should have gone 解析是说对过去情况的假设意为本来是 没懂
If it were not for literature,the well known writer J.K.Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.为什么用would have gone 不是对现在情况的虚拟么 A could go B must go C would have gone D should have gone 解析是说对过去情况的假
很高兴为您
If it were not for literature,the well known writer J.K.Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.如果不是因为文学,著名作家J.K.罗琳会终生默默无闻（本不会取得如今的成就）.
句子暗示“她已经不是默默无闻,已经取得了成就”,因此事对过去的虚拟,用“情态动词+完成时”.又因为“should+have done”表示“过去本应该...而实际没有...”,不符合题意.
其实本句为混合虚拟句式,即主从句虚拟的时间不一样,从句时对“开关现实情况的”即“现在”的虚拟,而主句是对“过去”的虚拟.
-------------------------------
★倾心解答★愿您满意★
★欢迎追问★敬请采纳★
-------------------------------
Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.
罗琳会终生默默无闻
这是活译译文，直译是：罗琳可能会走到 不存在的地方（或 无名之地，偏僻之壤；荒蛮地区） 在生活中。即：罗琳可能会在生活中无处可走。即：走不开或泯然众人，或者说 默默无闻
罗琳可能会在生活中无处可走，这是正确的译文理解，说成：罗琳会终生默默无闻，也无所谓啊。注意：默默...
全部展开
Rowling (would have gone)nowhere in life.
罗琳会终生默默无闻
这是活译译文，直译是：罗琳可能会走到 不存在的地方（或 无名之地，偏僻之壤；荒蛮地区） 在生活中。即：罗琳可能会在生活中无处可走。即：走不开或泯然众人，或者说 默默无闻
罗琳可能会在生活中无处可走，这是正确的译文理解，说成：罗琳会终生默默无闻，也无所谓啊。注意：默默无闻在这儿是意译，不是词组。
以上回答你满意么？
收起