澳洲公司法Retailer Ltd is a large public company operating many retail stores throughout Australia.Members of the board of Retailer include Smith and Jones.Smith is the Chairman of the board and Managing Director of Retailer.Myco Pty Ltd (Myco)

澳洲公司法Retailer Ltd is a large public company operating many retail stores throughout Australia.Members of the board of Retailer include Smith and Jones.Smith is the Chairman of the board and Managing Director of Retailer.Myco Pty Ltd (Myco)
澳洲公司法
Retailer Ltd is a large public company operating many retail stores throughout Australia.Members of the board of Retailer include Smith and Jones.Smith is the Chairman of the board and Managing Director of Retailer.Myco Pty Ltd (Myco) is a large private company in which Smith holds 30% of the issued shares.The directors of Myco are Smith’s wife and his brother in law.Myco is one of several Australian companies importing fashionable clothing from Hong Kong.The board of Retailer is considering tenders by these Australian companies for a lucrative contract to supply Retailer with the clothing.Myco is among the two or three most competitive companies considered by Retailer.When the tenders are considered by the Retailer board,Smith remains present to hear board discussion on the different tenders,but leaves the room before the final vote is taken and does not vote.
Most directors of Retailer are already aware from previous occasions that Smith is a shareholder in Myco.They also know that he is not a director of that company.At the Retailer board meeting,Jones (who has known Smith for many years) states:‘A supplier we know and can rely on will always be the best long-term choice for Retailer in these situations’.Although he says this to the board,Jones is privately aware that Myco has had financial difficulties in recent times and needs to secure this contract with Retailer.The remaining directors on the board agree with Jones.They know Smith to be a successful and well-respected businessman and reason that Myco is most likely to supply the clothing without disruption and at reasonable prices.The board therefore awards Myco a three year contract to supply Retailer.
1.Have Smith,Jones and the other directors of Retailer fully discharged their legal duties to Retailer?In your answer you should consider their duties under the Corporations Act and under relevant case law.
2.With what particular legal provisions under the Corporations Act should the board and the directors have complied?and
3.What would be the most appropriate remedy for a shareholder who later discovers that entering the contract with Myco,rather than a competing company,has in fact cost Retailer $10 million over the term of the three year contract?
这我实在不知道要怎么写额,有那位高人能给我指个大概方向或者写的思路哇

澳洲公司法Retailer Ltd is a large public company operating many retail stores throughout Australia.Members of the board of Retailer include Smith and Jones.Smith is the Chairman of the board and Managing Director of Retailer.Myco Pty Ltd (Myco)
1.
Jones/other directors-collateral purpose
Smith- interests conflict
Daniels v AWA Ltd(1995)
Permanent Building Society v Wheeler (1994)
2.
interests conflict,interests disclose
3.
shareholders' mandatory rights,unfair prejudice

零售商有限公司是一家大型上市公司经营澳大利亚各地的许多零售商店。对零售商的董事会成员包括史密斯和琼斯。史密斯是在董事会和总经理零售商董事。 Myco控股有限公司（Myco）是一家大型私营公司，史密斯的持有已发行股份的30％。对Myco董事史密斯的妻子和他的内弟。 Myco是从香港进口时装澳大利亚几个公司之一。董事会的零售商正在考虑由一个利润丰厚的合同，服装零售商提供这些澳洲公司的投标。 Myco是...

全部展开

零售商有限公司是一家大型上市公司经营澳大利亚各地的许多零售商店。对零售商的董事会成员包括史密斯和琼斯。史密斯是在董事会和总经理零售商董事。 Myco控股有限公司（Myco）是一家大型私营公司，史密斯的持有已发行股份的30％。对Myco董事史密斯的妻子和他的内弟。 Myco是从香港进口时装澳大利亚几个公司之一。董事会的零售商正在考虑由一个利润丰厚的合同，服装零售商提供这些澳洲公司的投标。 Myco是其中的两三个最具竞争力的零售商认为公司。当投标是由零售商董事会审议，史密斯现在仍然听到船上的不同投标的讨论，但离开前最后的投票室过，并没有投票。
大多数董事的零售商已经从以前的场合知道史密斯是Myco股东。他们还知道他是不是该公司的董事。在零售商董事会会议上，琼斯（谁已相识多年史密斯）指出：'一个供应商，我们知道，可以依靠永远是最好的长期零售商选择在这些情况下'。虽然他说这是董事会，琼斯是一家私营知道Myco已在最近的财政困难和需要，以确保这个零售商的合同。在董事会其余董事同意琼斯。他们知道史密斯是一个成功和备受尊敬的商人和理由Myco是最有可能的供应没有中断的衣服，以合理的价格。因此，委员会裁决Myco为期3年的合同，供应零售商。
1。有史密斯，琼斯和零售商的其他董事充分履行其法定职责，零售商？在你的答案你应该考虑根据公司法的职责，根据有关的案例法。
2。用什么根据公司法具体法律条文，董事会和董事有规定？和
3。什么会是谁的股东进入后发现，与Myco合同，而不是相互竞争的公司，最适当的补救措施，其实零售商的成本1000万美元以上的合同期限在3年？

收起