We’ll have time to stop for lunch,won’t we?和We should have enough time to have lunch.同意思吗
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/11/08 19:31:33
We’ll have time to stop for lunch,won’t we?和We should have enough time to have lunch.同意思吗
We’ll have time to stop for lunch,won’t we?和We should have enough time to have lunch.同意思吗
We’ll have time to stop for lunch,won’t we?和We should have enough time to have lunch.同意思吗
意思不尽相同.前者(“我们有停一下去吃饭的时间,是吧?”)是反义问句,意思是“我”觉得是这样,希望得到听者的反馈;而后者(“我们应该会有足够的时间去吃饭”)是陈述观点,说话者估计时间会是足够的,但对时间是否真的足够并不是完全肯定.
这里需要注意should表示“推测”的用法.We'll have enough time to have lunch.和We should have enough time to have lunch.有差别,前者很肯定“我们会有时间”,而后者只是推测“会有时间”,但具体是否真有并无十足把握.
should的另一个用法是表达“一旦”、“万一”.例如:If the machine should fail,ring this bell.如果机器一旦失灵就按这个铃儿.用should的这种条件句还可以改为如下的省略倒装:Should the machine fail,ring the bell.
不一样,第一句意思为:我们将会有时间吃午饭,不是吗?第二句,我们应该(应当)有足够的时间吃午饭。