求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!不需要太过复杂,一般的四级水平就行!

求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!不需要太过复杂,一般的四级水平就行!
求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!
不需要太过复杂,一般的四级水平就行!

求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文!不需要太过复杂,一般的四级水平就行!
The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged .But it’s this leap of technologies to prolong life and control dying that raises the controversial topic—euthanasia( 安乐死)or mercy killing.
People supporting mercy killing argue that euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients,relieving them from the agonizing pain , which is good for both the doomed people and their families. For these people,staving off death is to compromise a fundamental value—the quality of human life. However,those who object to euthanasia think it is immoral to give up treatment or commit suicide with doctors’ assistance.In their opinions, that is nothing less than murdering.
IN fact, to continue or terminate life is a moral choice because it involves a decision about a fundamental human good , the preservation of life . After all, life is the mast precious asset that we have for creativity and productivity.

What shall we do to a person when he is seriously iii and the hope of his keeping alive is very slight? Should we try every means to prolong his life in agony or should we just stop trying to do nothi...

全部展开

What shall we do to a person when he is seriously iii and the hope of his keeping alive is very slight? Should we try every means to prolong his life in agony or should we just stop trying to do nothing useful and inject some kind of drugs into his body so that this person may no longer suffer? Drug killing in this case is what is called "Euthanasia", or mercy killing.
Different people have different attitudes towards euthanasia. Some are of the opinion that euthanasia is necessary because it can relieve the fatally sick patient from both physical and psychological torture. Practicing this can save the other family members, relatives, and friends from the pain of having to witness torture that the patient does not otherwise need to bear from certain incurable illnesses. However, certain other people may argue that euthanasia is not a cure but a murder.
I am inclined to be strongly supportive on the practice of euthanasia. For one thing, it is meaningless to spend money on a patient that is definitely hopeless. Human beings, like everything living in this world, are mortal. No one can avoid death. In cases of serious diseases that go beyond the knowledge and skills of doctors, no one can help no matter what his family members try to de. For another, fatally sick patients usually need expensive medicines and intensive treatment. This means they are wasting medical resources that can reasonably be used on patients who really need them to recover. Lastly, some patients themselves do not want to suffer from the pain if they know that they are not curable. To conclude, I think practicing euthanasia is necessary, and legislative organizations should pass laws on it so that nothing more should be wasted on those who can not be saved.
翻译:我们应怎样一个人时，他正在认真三和他保持活着的希望是微乎其微？我们应千方百计延长他的痛苦生活，还是应该只停留在做什么有益的，他的身体注入一些药物，使此人可能不再受苦？药物在这种情况下杀人是所谓的“安乐死”，或安乐死。
不同的人对安乐死有不同的态度。有些人认为，安乐死是必要的，因为它可以减轻从生理和心理的致命病病人的酷刑。实践这可以节省其他家庭成员，亲属，并从有痛苦的朋友见证酷刑，病人没有其他需要承受一定的不可治愈的疾病。然而，某些人会说，安乐死是不治本，而是谋杀。
我倾向于要加强对实施安乐死的支持。一方面，是没有意义的花病人的钱是绝对没有希望的。人类一样，在这个世界上的一切生活，都是致命的。没有人能避免死亡。在重大疾病案件，超出了医生的知识和技能，没有人能帮助不管他的家人试图超越。其次，致命的病病人通常需要昂贵的药品和强化治疗。这意味着他们是在浪费可以合理的病人谁真正需要他们的医疗资源回收利用。最后，有些病人自己也不想遭受的痛苦，如果他们知道，他们无法治愈的。最后，我觉得练安乐死是必要的，立法机构应该通过法律，它没有什么更多的应该是谁浪费在那些无法保存。

收起

(以下内容全转载他处，楼主可参考以下链接）
One of the biggest controversies of this decade is euthanasia. Euthanasia is “inducing the painless death of a person for reasons assumed to be merciful?(Henrickson and Marti...

全部展开

(以下内容全转载他处，楼主可参考以下链接）
One of the biggest controversies of this decade is euthanasia. Euthanasia is “inducing the painless death of a person for reasons assumed to be merciful?(Henrickson and Martin 24). There are four types of euthanasia voluntary and direct, voluntary but indirect, direct but involuntary, and indirect and involuntary. Voluntary and direct euthanasia is “chosen and carried out by the patient.? Voluntary but indirect euthanasia is chosen in advance. Direct but involuntary euthanasia is done for the patient without his or her request. Indirect and involuntary euthanasia occurs when a hospital decides that it is time to remove life support (Fletcher 42-3).
Euthanasia can be traced as far back as to the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. Voluntary euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. As time passed, religion increased, and life was viewed to be sacred. Euthanasia in any form was seen as wrong (Encarta 98).
In this century there have been many groups formed that are for and against euthanasia. In 1935 the first group that was for the legalization of euthanasia was formed. It was called the Voluntary Euthanasia Society and was started by a group of doctors in London (The Voluntary Euthanasia Society). The first society established in the United States came shortly after in 1938. It was called the Hemlock Society and it now consists of more than 67,000 members. The purpose of this society is to support your decision to die and to offer support when you are ready to die (Humphrey 186). This society also believes that a person must have believed in euthanasia for a certain amount of time before you can make the request for death (Humphrey 112).
Euthanasia has been a large issue in the courts during this century. The first doctor was charged for performing euthanasia in1935. Harold Blazer was charged for the death of his daughter. His daughter was a victim of cerebral spinal meningitis. He killed her by placing a handkerchief soaked with chloroform over her face until she died. He had taken care of her for thirty years. In his trial he was acquitted (Humphrey 191). The first doctor to be found guilty was Joseph Hassman in 1986. He injected a lethal dose of Demerol into his mother-in-law by the request of her family. He was sentenced to two years probation, fined $10,000, and ordered to perform 400 hours of community service (Humphrey 194).
The most recent and most controversial euthanasia doctor is Dr. Jack Kevorkian. He was first charged with first degree murder in December of 1990. He connected Janet Adkins, a member of the Hemlock Society, to his “suicide machine?which allowed her to inject lethal drugs into her body at any time (Humphrey 195-96) . He has since then been present at the deaths of more than forty people (Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization).
A number of legal considerations are involved in the issue of euthanasia. The state has the right to become very involved in euthanasia cases. The state can specify the number of individuals that must agree for euthanasia to be performed. The state can specify how frequently someone can sign a euthanasia authorization. The state can also specify that only the individual can decide (Pahl 20).
Living wills are also a big part in the legal aspects of euthanasia. A living will can express a patient’s thoughts towards his future medical treatment (Horkan 70). Living wills are legal in forty states. They allow anyone capable of making decisions to tell the doctor beforehand that they do not wish to be put on life support (Encarta 98).
The medical methods and effects have a large impact on how people view euthanasia. Euthanasia can be performed by lethal injection, gas, the removal of life support equipment, the withholding of food and fluids, and the removal of necessary medicines. It is legal to turn off a patient’s life support when the higher centers of the brain stop working. Patients are allowed to choose passive euthanasia but can not choose active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is when nothing is done to prevent death. Active euthanasia is when one deliberately causes death (Encarta 98). One of the main forms of euthanasia is the process of withholding foods and fluids. Many see this as cruelty due to its effects on the patient. It causes nausea, vomiting, heart problems, depression, dry skin, and shortness in breath (Harris 5). As one can see there are many aspects and issues that make euthanasia controversial.

收起