英语辩论会Capitai punishment (the death penaity)should be abolished我是正方!那反方可能会怎样辩论?用英语!

英语辩论会Capitai punishment (the death penaity)should be abolished我是正方!那反方可能会怎样辩论?用英语!
英语辩论会Capitai punishment (the death penaity)should be abolished
我是正方!
那反方可能会怎样辩论?
用英语!

英语辩论会Capitai punishment (the death penaity)should be abolished我是正方!那反方可能会怎样辩论?用英语!
Supporters of capital punishment tend to accept many of these facts about flaws in the death penalty system.They argue that abolishing the death penalty because some innocent people will be killed (or some minorities or poor people will be unfairly sentenced to death) is tantamount to abolishing life-saving vaccines on the grounds that several people die each year of complications from vaccinations.The problem with this analogy is that unlike vaccines,the death penalty does not provide enough value to justify the taking of innocent life.Unlike vaccines,the death penalty does not save lives.There is absolutely no evidence that the death penalty deters murder any better than a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole.The evidence that the death penalty does not deter murder is so clear that hardly any proponent of capital punishment tries to support the death penalty on those grounds.Instead,the primary argument advanced in support of capital punishment tends to be that the death penalty provides society the opportunity to show how much it values innocent human life by invoking the ultimate punishment against those who take innocent life.It is perverse,however,to maintain a system that will inevitably kill innocent people in the name of showing how much we care about innocent life.
Proponents of the death penalty also assert that the injustices associated with the application of capital punishment are not unique to capital cases and that remedying the effects of race,poverty,and error would require dismantling our entire criminal justice system.No one would assert,they argue,that we should get rid of jails because some people are wrongly imprisoned