帮忙翻译篇论文,请不要把在线翻译的复制上来,麻烦各位百度大大了~~~As the world changed over the last five decades the post-war consensus on the rules and regulations governing the world economy was continuously eroded. Most

帮忙翻译篇论文,请不要把在线翻译的复制上来,麻烦各位百度大大了~~~As the world changed over the last five decades the post-war consensus on the rules and regulations governing the world economy was continuously eroded. Most
帮忙翻译篇论文,请不要把在线翻译的复制上来,麻烦各位百度大大了~~~
As the world changed over the last five decades the post-war consensus on the rules and regulations governing the world economy was continuously eroded. Most developing countries which were not present at the creation of these rules and regulations now question their legitimacy and equity. Some among them have asserted control over a strategic resources-petroleum----with spectacular results; others continue similar efforts, but without signal success to date. The revival of economic strength in post-war Europe and Japan led not only to a questioning of the rules they found inconvenient but to the collapse of these rules, the most significant case being the breakdown of the world monetary system agreed to at Bretton Woods in 1944.
The loss of consensus and the actual breakdown of some systems of global economic management have left the world economy in precarious circumstances. Currency values are unstable, trade is suffering as governments seek to shelter domestic producers, growth rates have slowed, unemployment is increasing. And all this not because the world is incapable of producing enough for its growing population or has run out of raw materials, but simply because the countries have not been able to agree on a fair system of managing the world’s economy.
Now we live in a period of profound economic changes. In the last ten years, some countries have suffered from serious frustration in their economy, while some other countries have developed their economy quite successfully.
Today, every nation shares the need to determine how to build competitive advantage in the face of increasing global economic competition. The experiences of successful and not-so-successful economies provide answers to the question.
First and foremost, a country must embrace open markets and free trade. Evidence from economically frustrated countries suggests that economic isolation leads to economic stagnation. Exposure to international market forces imposes more efficient allocation of resources and allows faster access to new production technologies. A commitment to open markets sometimes requires the will to accept short-term hardship in return for long-term economic vitality. Too often, protectionist measures to protect threatened domestic industries help only those with vested interests in threatened industries, while the country as a whole suffers.
Equally important, a country must educate its workforce because the success of a company in large measures a reflection of the skills of its employees. Countries that produce a superior work force will likely support a high number of globally competitive companies.
Finally, a nation must have an effective industrial policy. Dedication to free trade and education create conditions supportive of globally competitive industries, but does nothing to actually produce such industries. Industrial policy is a tricky thing. At its best, it creates new industries and converts sluggish local firms into world-class competitors. At its worst, it wastes large amounts of money.

帮忙翻译篇论文,请不要把在线翻译的复制上来,麻烦各位百度大大了~~~As the world changed over the last five decades the post-war consensus on the rules and regulations governing the world economy was continuously eroded. Most
上次的翻译你看了吗?兄弟花了好多时间才帮你搞定啊.你看看吧.（哈哈,有些回答的同志翻译成“它的浪废大量金钱”,好有意思!）
blend985,
请译作：
随着世界局势的变化,过去五十年来战后共识的规则和条例,令世界经济遭到不断的侵蚀.大多数发展中国家并未承认这些规则和条例的合法性和公平性,从而也导致现在问题的出现.其中一些已经断言被控制的战略资源,如石油----确是惊人的结果;他们在继续类似的努力,但成功却遥遥无期.振兴经济实力在战后欧洲和日本不仅导致了质疑,而且他们的规则也导致了经济上一定程度上的崩溃,这些规则,最重要的例子,如1944年在布雷顿森林,崩溃中的世界货币体系,有些制度规定的实际细目未能达成损失的共识,世界经济不稳定的情况已经超出了对全球经济的管理.货币价值是不稳定的,贸易是痛苦的.国内生产者寻求政府庇护,增长速度已经放慢,失业增加.而这一切并不是因为世界无法应付足够多的人口增长或及时生产已用完的原料,而只是因为国家一直未能达成一项公平的制度来管理世界经济.
现在,我们生活在一个时代变革的经济环境.在过去的十几年,一些国家遭受了严重挫折的经济,而其他一些国家却已制定了他们的规则,经济走向了成功.
今天,面对日益加剧的全球经济竞争环境,每一个国家,都在如何何建立竞争优势上分享自己的需求及经验,无论是成功的经验还是不太成功的经济体都为问题提供了答案.
首先,一个国家必须接受市场开放和自由贸易.从国家经济受的历史表明,经济孤立必然导致经济停滞.对暴露于国际市场的力量实行更有效地资源分配,并允许其更快地进入新的生产技术.承诺开放市场有时往往需要接受短期的困难,以换取长期的经济活力.通常,用保护主义的措施来保护国内产业的威胁,不仅帮助那些既得利益受到威胁产业,更会令作为一个整体的国家也受到影响.
同样重要的是,一个国家必须教育其员工,因为一家成功的公司在大型的措施上可以反映出员工的技能.国家卓越的生产劳动大军将大大提升公司的的全球竞争力.
（问题补充部分：）
最后,一个民族必须有一个有效的产业政策,致力于自由贸易和为提升全球竞争力创造条件的教育产业,但没有任何实际生产等行业.产业政策是一个棘手的事情.在最佳状态下,它将创造新的产业和转换,削减本地企业到世界级的竞争对手.在最坏的情况下,它将浪费大量金钱.