英语翻译从各国对欺诈的基本内涵的规定上看,欺诈应是破坏意思自治原则并且违背诚实信用原则的行为,在欺诈构成要件中应包含这二类要件,一类是形式要件,说明行为是破坏意思自治原则；

英语翻译从各国对欺诈的基本内涵的规定上看,欺诈应是破坏意思自治原则并且违背诚实信用原则的行为,在欺诈构成要件中应包含这二类要件,一类是形式要件,说明行为是破坏意思自治原则；
英语翻译
从各国对欺诈的基本内涵的规定上看,欺诈应是破坏意思自治原则并且违背诚实信用原则的行为,在欺诈构成要件中应包含这二类要件,一类是形式要件,说明行为是破坏意思自治原则；另一类是实质要件,说明行为是违背诚实信用原则.我国立法中没有关于欺诈构成要件的明确规定,司法实践中一般采用的是学术界的四要件说,这四要件仅仅是欺诈的形式要件,因此应加入违背诚实信用原则这一实质要件,完善我国立法.本文将首先探讨欺诈的概念定义,进而对国内外有关欺诈构成要件的相关学说以及我国关于期诈构成要件的立法实践进行介绍,并在此基础上对于引入诚实信用原则作为我国期诈构成要件的必要性进行分析.

英语翻译从各国对欺诈的基本内涵的规定上看,欺诈应是破坏意思自治原则并且违背诚实信用原则的行为,在欺诈构成要件中应包含这二类要件,一类是形式要件,说明行为是破坏意思自治原则；
For the provisions of the basic connotation of the fraud in defferent countries,Fraud refers to the destruction of the principle of autonomy and violates the principle of honesty and credibility,and its constitutive requirements include two essential conditions:
The first step is the formal requirement that interprets the behaviors of the breach of the principle of autonomy ; the later step is the substantive requirement that explicates the behaviors of the breach of honesty and credibility.
There does not exist the clear provisions of the elements of fraud legislation in China,four essential conditions commonly apply to the juridical practices,and they are not only the formal requirement,therefore,the principle of honesty and credibilityof this substantive element should be added to improve our legislation.
This text investigates the concept of fraud in the first place,and then introduces the constitutive fraud requirements of the domestic and foreign related doctrines and that of the legislative practices in our country,so as toanalyze the necessities of the introduction of the principle of honesty and credibility on this basis for the constitutive elements of domestic fraud.

in terms of the basic content and regulation of fraud in various countries, fraud is the action that breaks the rule of self-rule and goes against the principle of honesty. the element of constituting...

全部展开

in terms of the basic content and regulation of fraud in various countries, fraud is the action that breaks the rule of self-rule and goes against the principle of honesty. the element of constituting a fraud should contain the following elements, one is formatic element, which proves that the action breaks the rule of self-rule, anoth one is substantial element, which proves that the actoin is against the rule of honesty. there is no specific regulations on the constituting elements of fraud in the legislation of our country, the four academic elements is ofen taken in the jurisdicial practice, which is only the formatic elements. therefore, the priciple of breaking honest, the substantial element should be added so as to better our legislation. this article first disscusses the concept and definition of fraud, then introduces the relevent doctrine on elements of constituting a fraud in outside countries and our country. Based on this, it analyzes the necessity of bringing in the principle of honesty as the constituting element for fraud.
楼主太吝啬了，都不给分。。。。。

收起