有关justice and equality 的英文作文

有关justice and equality 的英文作文
有关justice and equality 的英文作文

有关justice and equality 的英文作文
（供你参考）
"Whether in China or in the west,everyone is equal before the law and are an ancient principle.
In western countries,the early history of the concept of equal produced.For example,Aristotle was put forward,and shall have equal legal quality,In the feudal society,western Christian thought all has the sin of equality,everyone is god's voters.Now the everyone is equal before the law in the late medieval by bourgeois enlightenment thinkers,such as rock,Rousseau man.
However,the world is the true equality?Someone says,at least in some places more equality.But these words or into the equality of "narrow" concept.If you get unfair treatment in somewhere in another land,but this won the "equality" in other aspects you lose the inequality but yourself but didn't notice.
"All are equal before the law",different people in the understanding of different extent,for example,are equal before the law,including legislation equality?Civilians could legislation?How do you know that equal legal equality and the relationship between?Actually,everyone is equal before the law,is in the implementation of the law,justice and law enforcement,law-abiding equality so that everyone is equal before the law shall include the equality of legislation,only legislation and law enforcement,equal to realize the equality of law.
The so-called "everyone is equal before the law",to the equality of political position,a kind of equality of rights and qualification.Legal recognition and protection of citizens' rights and obligations in equal status,the don't allow anyone to have the privilege of above.In today's world."everyone is equal before the law",is built on the basis of capitalism."

In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, people’s materia...

全部展开

In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, people’s material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonstrates that distributive justice does not tolerate deep inequality.
In the course of providing a deep and sophisticated critique of Rawls’s theory of justice, Cohen demonstrates that questions of distributive justice arise not only for the state but also for people in their daily lives. The right rules for the macro scale of public institutions and policies also apply, with suitable adjustments, to the micro level of individual decision-making.
Cohen also charges Rawls’s constructivism with systematically conflating the concept of justice with other concepts. Within the Rawlsian architectonic, justice is not distinguished either from other values or from optimal rules of social regulation. The elimination of those conflations brings justice closer to equality.

收起