英语翻译五、研究初期结果1.参与实验面积1）已在2010级 16个 班中大规模使用在线评分系统一学期,参加试验人数达470 人.学期末收到调查表 470 份.2）该项目在2011级英语专业两个行政班（80人

英语翻译五、研究初期结果1.参与实验面积1）已在2010级 16个 班中大规模使用在线评分系统一学期,参加试验人数达470 人.学期末收到调查表 470 份.2）该项目在2011级英语专业两个行政班（80人
英语翻译
五、研究初期结果
1.参与实验面积
1）已在2010级 16个 班中大规模使用在线评分系统一学期,参加试验人数达470 人.
学期末收到调查表 470 份.
2）该项目在2011级英语专业两个行政班（80人）和2012级6个行政班（ 320 人）当中适用.
2.初期研究结果
l 2012年7月收到调查问卷 470份.其中同学们对系统使用的看法是：
1）其中96.3%的同学认为在线作文评分系统对自己有比较大或很大的帮助；
2）几乎是所有同学（99.1%）表示会向周围的同学推荐使用该系统.
3）100%的同学表示以后在没有老师要求的情况下会自己使用该系统提高英语写作.
4）98.9%的同学认为把在线评分系统和教师传统评改结合效果会更好；
剩下的个别同学认为传统评改更加适合自己.
5）98.3%（462人）的同学认为该系统比较真实得反应出了自己的英语水平；
6）97.2%（457人）的同学表示每次仔细看了作文评语,认为评语比较正确,而剩下的同学虽然看了评语,但并不清楚评语是否准确.
l 由于初期使用的是系统评分,同学们对系统功能提出一些修改意见：
1）增加相应的例文分析与美文美句；
2）低语警示中有很多模糊信息,最主要原因是语料库信息不够完善.希望能够结合网络增加语料库信息,提高评分质量；
3）提供在线咨询功能或是结合传统作文评分,得到更准确的信息反馈；
4）该评分系统着重在词语句子拼写方面提出意见,但是在内容和结构方面缺乏相应的具体评论或意见提示；
5）希望给出模板句；
6）在不断修改提交后只有最后一次的作文,希望能够保留每次修改的信息,用来关注自己提高的程度；
7) 提供更多的近义词或替换词使用方面的信息；
8）提供更多的句式变化的建议和提示；
9）提供分享功能,把同学之间的好句子或范文筛选出来共享；
10）增加同学之间的讨论功能,对一些个人存在的疑问可以在该平台昂与其他同学老师讨论和分享；
11）增加允许阅读其他同学作文的功能；
12） 增加平台上的语音或视频功能；
13）在指出作文问题的同时提示作文优秀的地方,增加写作者的信心；
14) 评语有些千篇一律,应更加个性化；
15）在根据提示修改作文后,有时作文分数会低于以前的分数；
结论：这是一学期大规模使用评分系统的一个初步研究.从数据显示同学们对在线系统由好奇到实际操作,大多数同学采取的是积极接受态度,并且持以高度评价,认为该系统对自己的作文水平有明显提高,尤其是在没有老师辅导的情况下能得到及时的信息反馈.同时对于教师来说,在很大程度上减轻了教师的负担；革新了新的写作教学模式,可以随时监测对比个体学生的作文情况,以便更有效地制定和调整教学模式和内容.这为下个阶段的研究奠定了坚实的基础.

英语翻译五、研究初期结果1.参与实验面积1）已在2010级 16个 班中大规模使用在线评分系统一学期,参加试验人数达470 人.学期末收到调查表 470 份.2）该项目在2011级英语专业两个行政班（80人
Five, at the beginning of the research results of the 1 experiments involved in area 1) has 16 classes in grade 2010 in the large-scale use of online scoring system for a semester, to test up to 470 the number of people. At the end of the semester received 470 questionnaires. 2) the project in the 2011 English professional two administrative class (80 people) and 2012 level 6 administrative class (320 people) applicable. 2 the initial research results of L in 2012 July received 470 copies of questionnaires. The students on the system view is: 1) 96.3% of the students think that online essay scoring system is relatively large or great help for themselves; 2) is almost all students (99.1%) said to the students around the recommend the use of the system. 3) 100% of the students said they would use the system to improve English writing in the future under the condition of no teacher. 4) 98.9% of the students think the online scoring system and traditional teacher evaluation combined with the effect will be better; the rest of the individual students think traditional correction is more suitable for their own. 5) 98.3% (462) of the students think that the system is real to reflect their English level; 6) 97.2% (457) of the students said that every time carefully read the writing comments, that reviews more correctly, and the rest of the students even read reviews, but it is not clear what the comments are not accurate. L due to the initial system with score, the students put forward some suggestions for the revision of system function: 1) increase the corresponding example analysis and the beautiful words; 2) there are lots of fuzzy information in whispers warnings, the main reason is the imperfect corpus information. Want to be able to combine the network increase corpus information, improve the score of quality; 3) offer online consulting function or a combination of traditional essay scoring, get more accurate feedback information; 4) the scoring system focuses on the spelling in word sentence opinions, but in terms of content and structure of the lack of specific comments or opinions; 5) hope given the template sentence; 6) in the changing composition only the last submission, hope to be able to retain every change information, to focus on their own improvement; 7) to provide more synonyms or replace the word usage information; 8) advice and tips provide syntactic change more; 9) provide the sharing function among the students, the good sentences or the selected shared; 10) increase the students in discussions between function, for some personal problems can in this platform ang and other students and teachers to discuss and share; 11) added to allow reading other classmates composition function; 12) increase the voice or video function on the platform; 13) prompt composition for excellent pointed out. At the same time, increase the confidence; 14) reviews some stereotyped, Should be more personalized; 15) changes in the composition according to the prompt, sometimes writing score will be lower than the previous scores; conclusion: This is a preliminary study on a semester of large-scale use of scoring system. From the data show the students on the online system by curiosity to the actual operation, most of the students take the positive attitude of acceptance, and with a high evaluation, consider the system has obvious improvement of your own writing level, especially can get timely information feedback in the absence of tutoring case. At the same time for teachers, largely reducing the burden of the teachers; reform of the new teaching mode, can at any time to monitor the composition between individual students, in order to effectively formulate and adjust the teaching mode and content. Which laid a solid foundation for the next stage of research.
头都晕了