英语翻译In Figure 2b,interstorey drift and horizontal displacement from pushover and dynamicanalyses are compared,considering total drift of 1.0%.It can be observed that interstorey driftobtained from dynamic analysis are maximum at the third flo
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/25 12:41:42
英语翻译In Figure 2b,interstorey drift and horizontal displacement from pushover and dynamicanalyses are compared,considering total drift of 1.0%.It can be observed that interstorey driftobtained from dynamic analysis are maximum at the third flo
英语翻译
In Figure 2b,interstorey drift and horizontal displacement from pushover and dynamic
analyses are compared,considering total drift of 1.0%.It can be observed that interstorey drift
obtained from dynamic analysis are maximum at the third floor and close to results obtained from
first-mode and DAP analyses.Comparison of static against dynamic results,in terms of both
capacity curves as well as inter-storey drift profiles,leads to the conclusion that displacementbased
adaptive pushover features the highest potential to better reproduce results of incremental
(a) (b)
(a)
(b)
dynamic analysis.In Table 2,displacement ductility (μ),computed as the ratio between ultimate
top displacement (corresponding to attainment of ultimate concrete compression strain) and its
yield counterpart (attainment of yielding stress fy of steel bars) are reported.
Frame structures depicted in Figure 3 are considered for second and third case studies.
Mechanical properties of materials are reported in Table 1.Distributed vertical loadings on beams
is equal to 20 kN/m.In Figure 4a,for the 2nd case study,comparison between results of pushover
procedures and incremental dynamic analyses is shown.Note that,contrarily to the first casestudy,
not all values obtained by dynamic analyses are inside the area enclosed between two
capacity curves from conventional pushover analyses [6].For this case-study,all pushover curves
are grouped close together,hence no clear winner can be identified.In Figure 4b,for the 3rd case
study,comparison between results of
英语翻译In Figure 2b,interstorey drift and horizontal displacement from pushover and dynamicanalyses are compared,considering total drift of 1.0%.It can be observed that interstorey driftobtained from dynamic analysis are maximum at the third flo
在图2b中,层间漂移和水平位移侧推和动态
分析比较,考虑到1.0%的总漂移.可以看出,层间漂移
从动态分析得到的是在三楼最大,接近取得成果
第一种形式和DAP分析.比较静态对动态结果,在这两个词
容量曲线以及跨层漂移型材,得出的结论是displacementbased
侧推自适应功能的最大潜力,更好地再现了增量结果
(一)(二)
(一)
(二)
动态分析.在表2,位移延性(μ),作为最终的比例计算之间
顶位移(相当于最终实现混凝土压应变)及其
产量对应(对钢筋的屈服应力风云程度)的报告.
在图3所示的框架结构被认为是第二次和第三次的个案研究.
材料的机械性能报告表1.垂直分布荷载的梁
等于20千牛顿/米图4a,为第二个案研究,比较的结果之间的推覆
程序和增量动态分析显示.请注意,反而第一的个案研究,
不以动态分析得到的所有值都在两个封闭的区域
从传统的推覆分析能力曲线[6].对于这个个案研究中,所有推覆曲线
分组紧密,因此没有明显的胜者可以识别.在图4b中,为第三案
研究结果比较