3道六级改错题1.In the long run, however, this hurry to shed full-time staff may be more harmful to industry as it is to the workforce.2.. If the letter to be mailed was placed on the writing table an hour ago, it is certain being there now. 3.I

3道六级改错题1.In the long run, however, this hurry to shed full-time staff may be more harmful to industry as it is to the workforce.2.. If the letter to be mailed was placed on the writing table an hour ago, it is certain being there now. 3.I
3道六级改错题
1.In the long run, however, this hurry to shed full-time staff may be more harmful to industry as it is to the workforce.
2.. If the letter to be mailed was placed on the writing table an hour ago, it is certain being there now.
3.In debating, one must correct the opponent’s facts, deny the relevance of his proof, or deny that what he presents as proof, unless relevant, is sufficient.
怎麼改,怎麼分析的

3道六级改错题1.In the long run, however, this hurry to shed full-time staff may be more harmful to industry as it is to the workforce.2.. If the letter to be mailed was placed on the writing table an hour ago, it is certain being there now. 3.I
15.In the long run,however,this hurry to shed full?time staff may be harmful to industry as it is to the workforce.
A.more B.so C.such D.as
[答案] D.as
[注释] as ...as ...与……一样…….such是形容词,不能作程度状语修饰其他形容词;除非形容词后有名词,则such和该形容词一起修饰该名词.so不能入选,因为在原级形容词比较时,肯定句中必须用as ...as,而否定句中则可用not so ...as;现代英语中也常用not as ...as.
[译文]然而,从长远观点来看,这样匆忙打发掉全时工可能对行业和劳工都是有害的.
你以上的第一题是出自这里吧,2000年全国硕士学位研究生入学考试英语试卷第15题.
12.If the letter to be mailed was placed on the writing table an hour ago,it is certain being there now.
being 是错误部分,应改为 to be,一般常用sb.be certain to do sth.
此句意为“如果那封要寄的信一个小时前是放在写字台上的,那它现在肯定在那儿.”
In debating,one must correct the opponent’s facts,deny the relevance of his proof,or deny that what he presents as proof,unless relevant,is sufficient.
.
that是错误部分,应该删掉.因为 what he presents as proof,unless relevant,is sufficient才是deny 的宾语从句.我们知道that也可以引导宾从,但前提是that在从句中只做引导成分,却不会充当主语或宾语之类的成分,即在所引导的第一个宾从中可以省略不写也不会影响句子内容.而此处应为presents sth.as proof 而用what来代替,即做present的宾语,又引导宾语从句刚好.另外还有个规律,一个从句中是能由两个引导词来引导的.此句意为“在辩论时,一方必须纠正对方所列的事实,否认其证据的相关性,或否认对方所提证据的充分性,即使这种证据与辩论有关.”