英语翻译不纯正不作为共犯是不纯正不作为犯与共同犯罪相竟合的犯罪形态,在国内系统研究的为数不多.作为不纯正不作为犯在不作为共犯中的体现,涉及的理论非常范围广泛并且内容复杂,鉴

英语翻译不纯正不作为共犯是不纯正不作为犯与共同犯罪相竟合的犯罪形态,在国内系统研究的为数不多.作为不纯正不作为犯在不作为共犯中的体现,涉及的理论非常范围广泛并且内容复杂,鉴
英语翻译
不纯正不作为共犯是不纯正不作为犯与共同犯罪相竟合的犯罪形态,在国内系统研究的为数不多.作为不纯正不作为犯在不作为共犯中的体现,涉及的理论非常范围广泛并且内容复杂,鉴于其在司法实践中的多发性,本文侧重于不纯正不作为共犯成立的理论以及现实中发现的实际类型进行探讨.
目前理论界对不纯正不作为共同犯罪的研究主要是立足于在不作为共同犯罪中整体中进行讨论,没有系统全面对其进行研究、论述.虽然有一些论文对不作为共同犯罪成立的理论进行了探讨,但是很少结合我国的具体情况,而且忽略了不纯正不作为共犯在司法实践中的运用问题,这就难以是不纯正不作为共同犯罪理论在我国司法实践产生其相应的作用,尤其是过多于依赖于在国外理论上的探讨,不利于该理论在我国实践中的借鉴.本文分为四章,第一章是不纯正不作为共犯概论,主要论述不纯正不作为共犯需要明确的基本概念如不作为、不纯正不作为、片面共犯、不作为共犯、不纯正不作为共犯；第二章是不纯正不作为共犯成立,主要论述不纯正不作为共犯成立要件的相关理论包括主观要件与客观要件；第三章是不纯正不作为共犯类型化分析,在讨论不纯正不作为共犯成立的要件理论之余,集中我国司法实践中出现的多发案件,进行类型化的论述,分别就各种不同类型的不纯正不作为共犯成立问题进行分析.第四章是不纯正不作为共犯责任,分析不纯正不作为共犯类型化的成立后,集中讨论各种由不纯正不作为构成共犯的存在以及如何进行处罚.
标题：不纯正不作为共犯；作为义务； 成立；不纯正不作为共犯概论；不纯正不作为的概念；不作为共犯的概念；不纯正不作为共犯的概念；不纯正不作为共犯成立；不纯正不作为共犯的主观方面；不纯正不作为共犯的客观方面；不纯正不作为共犯类型化分析；亲属或有监护关系的不作为责任；封闭或管理空间的不作为责任；中立行为的作为责任；后行为的不作为责任；共同犯罪的不作为责任；不纯正不作为共犯责任；不纯正不作为正犯；不纯正不作为帮助犯；不纯正不作为教唆犯

英语翻译不纯正不作为共犯是不纯正不作为犯与共同犯罪相竟合的犯罪形态,在国内系统研究的为数不多.作为不纯正不作为犯在不作为共犯中的体现,涉及的理论非常范围广泛并且内容复杂,鉴
Omission accomplice is the omission and common crime competing crime patterns, in one of the few domestic system. An omission in not as an accomplice of the theory involved and very broad in scope, given the complexity of multiple, this article focuses on the omission of the theory as well as accomplices in reality the actual type is found. Currently without omission of the study is based on the omission of common crime overall in the discussions, there is no system for their research, expositions. Although there are some papers on common crime theory was discussed, but rarely in conjunction with the specific situation of our country, and ignoring the omission of complicity in the law, it is difficult to be impure common crime theory in its judicial role, particularly through more dependent on outside the theoretical discussion, is not conducive to the theory of reference. This article is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is impure introduction to the main exposition of complicity, impure accomplice need clear basic concepts such as not to act, omission, accomplice, not as an accomplice, omission of complicity; chapter II is impure accomplices, the main exposition of impure accomplices in the elements of the relevant theories including the subjective element of objective elements; chapter III is the omission of an accomplice, typed, in discussing the omission of elements of the theory of accomplices, the focus of China's judicial practice in many cases, typed essay on different types of omission of accomplices. Chapter four is impure accomplice liability, analysis of impure accomplice typed up focus by omission constitute existence of complicity and a penalty. Title: omission as an accomplice;;; omission introduction to complicity; omission concept; no concept as an accomplice; omission concept of complicity; omission accomplices; omission the subjective aspect of complicity; omission of complicity; omission accomplice typed analysis; relatives or guardianship, not being responsible; closed or management space not as responsibility; responsibility of neutral Act; Act of omission responsibility; omission of joint criminal liability; omission accomplices responsibility; omission is committing; omission accessory; omission instigator

Impure is pure as an accomplice, and common crime are not as committed to competing forms of crime together, the few in the domestic system. As impure not as guilty as an accomplice in the embodiment ...

全部展开

Impure is pure as an accomplice, and common crime are not as committed to competing forms of crime together, the few in the domestic system. As impure not as guilty as an accomplice in the embodiment is not involved in the theory of complexity is Fan Wei broad and, in view of judicial practice in the multiple, this is not pure is not as focused on the theory of accomplices and the reality of Fa Xian's of the actual type.
Theorists do not present as a common criminal is not pure research is mainly based on not as a common crime in the entirety of the discussion, there is no systematic and comprehensive study of its discussed. While some papers do not set up as a common crime theories discussed, but few specific situation in our country, but also ignored the Impure as an accomplice in judicial practice, the use of the problem, which is not pure is not as difficult for the common theory of crime in our judicial practice and the corresponding role, especially too much to rely on the theoretical study in a foreign country is not conducive to the theory of reference in our practice. This article is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is not pure no introduction as an accomplice, the main discussion is not as pure an accomplice need not clear the basic concepts, such as omission, Omission, accomplice, not as an accomplice, not as an accomplice is not pure; The second chapter is set up as an accomplice, not pure, the main discussion Impure set up as an accomplice in the theory of the elements, including elements of the subjective and objective elements; third chapter is pure type of analysis not as an accomplice in the discussion of complicity in the establishment of Omission over the elements of theory, focused on judicial practice in China appear multiple cases for the type of discourse, respectively, on a variety of different types of non-native is not set up as an accomplice, analysis of the problem. Chapter IV is not pure no responsibility as an accomplice, of Impure typed as an accomplice after the establishment of focus on various kinds of Omission and how to constitute the existence of an accomplice be punished.
Title: Impure as an accomplice; as obligations; established; Impure introduction as an accomplice; Omission of concepts; not the concept as an accomplice; not pure concept not as an accomplice; not pure is not set up as an accomplice; not pure not as an accomplice of the subjective; not pure is not as objective aspects of an accomplice; not pure type of analysis not as an accomplice; family relationship or guardianship is not a responsibility; closed or management space, not as a responsibility; neutral acts as a responsibility; not as a liability after the act; common crime, not as a duty; Omission accomplice liability; Omission Principal; Omission help offenders; Omission instigator.
希望对你有帮助！

收起

Impure is pure as an accomplice, and common crime are not as committed to competing forms of crime together, the few in the domestic system. As a non-Omission not reflected as an accomplice in coverin...

全部展开

Impure is pure as an accomplice, and common crime are not as committed to competing forms of crime together, the few in the domestic system. As a non-Omission not reflected as an accomplice in covering a very wide range of theory and complexity, given its multiple in the judicial practice, this article does not focus on the pure theory is not established as an accomplice, and the reality found in the of the actual type.
Theorists do not present as a common crime, not pure research is based on the overall crime is not as common in the discussion, there is no systematic and comprehensive study of its discussed. While some papers do not set up as a common crime, the theory discussed, but few combine the specific situation in China, but also ignored the Impure as an accomplice in judicial practice, the use of the problem, which is not pure is not as difficult for the common theory of crime in our judicial practice and the corresponding role, especially too much to rely on the theoretical study abroad, not in favor of the theory of reference in our practice. This article is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is not pure no introduction as an accomplice, the main discussion is not as pure an accomplice need not clear the basic concepts, such as omission, Omission, accomplice, not as an accomplice, not as an accomplice is not pure; The second chapter is set up as an accomplice, not pure, the main discussion Impure set up as an accomplice in the theory of the elements, including elements of the subjective and objective elements; third chapter is pure type of analysis not as an accomplice in the discussion of complicity in the establishment of Omission Apart from the elements theory, focused on judicial practice in China appear multiple cases for the type of discourse, respectively, on various types of non-native issue is not set up as an accomplice in the analysis. Chapter IV is not pure no responsibility as an accomplice, of Impure typed as an accomplice after the establishment of focus on various kinds of Omission and how to constitute the existence of an accomplice be punished.
Title: Impure as an accomplice; as obligations; established; Impure introduction as an accomplice; Omission of concepts; not the concept as an accomplice; not pure concept not as an accomplice; not pure is not set up as an accomplice; not pure not as an accomplice of the subjective; not pure is not as objective aspects of an accomplice; not pure type of analysis not as an accomplice; family relationship or guardianship is not a responsibility; closed or management space, not as a responsibility; neutral acts as a responsibility; not as a liability after the act; common crime, not as a duty; Omission accomplice liability; Omission Principal; Omission help offenders; Omission instigator

收起