对过去事实的虚拟中的:would /could / should /might + have done 有什么区别?We got a flat tire on our way back home or we ___ home an hour earlier.A.would have got B.should have got 两个答案是否都对呢?有什么区别呢?

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/11/17 04:40:21
对过去事实的虚拟中的:would/could/should/might+havedone有什么区别?Wegotaflattireonourwaybackhomeorwe___homeanhourear

对过去事实的虚拟中的:would /could / should /might + have done 有什么区别?We got a flat tire on our way back home or we ___ home an hour earlier.A.would have got B.should have got 两个答案是否都对呢?有什么区别呢?
对过去事实的虚拟中的:would /could / should /might + have done 有什么区别?
We got a flat tire on our way back home or we ___ home an hour earlier.
A.would have got B.should have got
两个答案是否都对呢?有什么区别呢?

对过去事实的虚拟中的:would /could / should /might + have done 有什么区别?We got a flat tire on our way back home or we ___ home an hour earlier.A.would have got B.should have got 两个答案是否都对呢?有什么区别呢?
A would have done推测,类似“就会提前一小时到家”,should have done,类似“否则我们一小时前就该到家了”,区别不大

would /could / should /might + have done 这几种表达的区别很小。should往往用于第一人称,would用于各种人称,表示“有前面的那种情况,就有后面的结果”。而might和could表示“可能,或许”。

选A,有区别

第一位正解,就是人称不同

对过去事实的虚拟中的:would /could / should /might + have done 有什么区别?We got a flat tire on our way back home or we ___ home an hour earlier.A.would have got B.should have got 两个答案是否都对呢?有什么区别呢? 虚拟语气中的“与过去事实相反”和“对过去的假设”是不是一个概念?虚拟语气中总是分“与过去(现在、将来)事实相反”,可是老师讲课有很喜欢说,这一题是“对过去(现在,将来)的假 虚拟语气中对过去的虚拟主句否定是用would have not done or would not have done? 英语翻译The victim _____________(本来有机会活下来)if he had been taken to hospital in time.would have a chance to survive.为什么一定是对现在事实的虚拟,我写的就是对过去事实的虚拟would have had a chance to survive 请问虚拟语气 表示与将来事实相反的情况在虚拟语气中,表示与现在事实相反,或者与将来事实相反都可以用这个结构IF +一般过去 主句:WOULD COULD MIGHT +DO 的形式,如果是对的,我要怎么去区别呢, 虚拟语气对过去事实假设不是应该用would+have+过去分词吗,为什么我做到一道题用would+动词原形?if you ( ) him yesterday,you ( ) what to do.答案给的D.A.asked,would knowB.had asked,would have knownC.asked him,knowD.had 关于would rather的虚拟语气would rather have done跟would rather had done是不是都是表示对过去的虚拟语气? 虚拟语气,与过去事实相反 :从句 :had + 过去分词 主句 :would/ should/ could/ might + have + done虚拟语气,与过去事实相反 :从句 :had + 过去分词 ,主句 :would/ should/ could/ might + have + done,为什么有时会有wou if i loved you,i would fall in love with you.if she unloved you,what would you do?这if i loved you,i would fall in love with you.if she unloved you,what would you do?这俩句子对不?在求一个与过去事实相反的虚拟语气! 过去将来时和虚拟语气之间有联系吗?i knew she would agree with me.过去将来 would+原型if i were you,i would agree with it.虚拟语气 would+原型好像有些联系.难道虚拟语气表达与现在事实相反的时候 主句就 虚拟语气的主句,什么时候用would do?什么时候用would have done?我的参考书上写 主句的事实与现在相反,用would do;主句的事实与过去相反,用 would have done 我不太明白啊 虚拟语气不都是 本来应该 wish的虚拟语气在表示对过去情况的虚拟 wish + 主语 + would(could)+ have + 过去分词表示对过去情况的虚拟:wish + 主语 + had + 过去分词到底对过去情况虚拟用什么啊 还是都可以用 He wished he ___ more about the subject ,so he could talk about it .A had known B knew C would know D knows答案为什么选Cwished不是过去时吗,所以应该是与过去事实相反的虚拟选择A才对啊? 具体点.if only在虚拟语气中的具体用法与过去事实相反,后面什么时态?与现在事实相反,后面什么时态?与将来事实相反,后面什么时态?2楼别给我弄那么多没有用的! 为什么wish后的宾语从句对将来的虚拟语气是would/could,而不是过去时? would rather 接从句时,对于现在和将来的虚拟都得用一般过去式,对过去的虚拟用过去完成时 ,那它什么时候后面是动词原形 关于虚拟语气的介词withoutwithout the workers help ,sam _____ so much progressA.would not make B would not have made 为什么选B、与过去事实相反为什么与过去的事实相反,应该是与现在的事实相反啊。 If they had studied hard, they could do it easily now 这个虚拟语气中这个虚拟语气中,虚拟语气是与过去事实相反,从句用had+过去分词,那么主句不是应该用should/would/could/might+have过去分词的吗? 为什么这