SAT语法题2道 1.The Pacific Northewest (averaging 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly) by lighting.A.原句B.averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused D.with an average of 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly PS:括号内是A选项问:为
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/21 17:15:13
SAT语法题2道 1.The Pacific Northewest (averaging 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly) by lighting.A.原句B.averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused D.with an average of 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly PS:括号内是A选项问:为
SAT语法题2道
1.The Pacific Northewest (averaging 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly) by lighting.
A.原句
B.averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused
D.with an average of 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly
PS:括号内是A选项
问:为何原句和D选项是错的
2.An entire ant colony working together can solve problems,(such as when they find) the shortest path to a food source ,that are impossible for an individual ant to solve.
A.原句
B.such as finding of
C.such as finding
问:B选项为什么不对
SAT语法题2道 1.The Pacific Northewest (averaging 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly) by lighting.A.原句B.averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused D.with an average of 4000 wildfires a year,caused mostly PS:括号内是A选项问:为
第一个句子,A和D选项把句子主干挑出来都是:The Pacific Northwest caused mostly by lighting.显然是不对的,无法构成逻辑关系.而且从句意上看,不是The Pacific Northwest由于雷电引起,而是指wildfires由于雷电引起.因此,用most (of the wildfires) are caused by ...就是正确的.再者,两个完整句子之间用分号“;”来连接是可以的,因此B是正确答案.
第二题,such as 后面应加上名词或V-ing.如果把finding看成名词的话,至少要说成the finding of ...,因此这儿的finding只能是v-ing形式,故C是正确的.
1. 把正确答案带入:
The Pacific Northewest averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused by lighting.
这样构成了两个句子。其谓语分别是:averages和are caused 。符合语境,符合于法要求。
太平洋西北平均每年发生4000起(森林)野火。他们大部分是由闪电引起的。
全部展开
1. 把正确答案带入:
The Pacific Northewest averages 4000 wildfires a year; most are caused by lighting.
这样构成了两个句子。其谓语分别是:averages和are caused 。符合语境,符合于法要求。
太平洋西北平均每年发生4000起(森林)野火。他们大部分是由闪电引起的。
如果填入D:
The Pacific Northewest (with an average of 4000 wildfires a year), caused mostly by lighting.
这样的话:The Pacific Northewest是主语。caused是谓语。
不知所云。
2. such as finding of the shortest path to a food source ,应该理解为:诸如对食物来源捷径的发现。
such as finding the shortest path to a food source,应该理解为:诸如发现了食物来源的捷径。
这两句话的侧重点是不一样的。
finding of 是个of名词词组,强调状态,表示一种静止的结果。
finging 是个动名词结构,强调动作,表示动态的结果。
你好,切真无语!满意吗?如果不满意可以追问。满意的话请采纳。
收起