英语翻译The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme.The historian is nether the humble slave,nor the tyrannical master,of his facts.The relation between the historian and his facts is one of equality,of gi
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2025/02/02 14:08:13
英语翻译The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme.The historian is nether the humble slave,nor the tyrannical master,of his facts.The relation between the historian and his facts is one of equality,of gi
英语翻译
The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme.The historian is nether the humble slave,nor the tyrannical master,of his facts.The relation between the historian and his facts is one of equality,of give-and-take.As any working historian knows,if he stops to reflect what he is doing as he thinks and writes,the historian is engaged on a continuous process of moulding his facts to his interpretation and his interpretation to his facts.It is impossible to assign primacy to one over the other
英语翻译The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme.The historian is nether the humble slave,nor the tyrannical master,of his facts.The relation between the historian and his facts is one of equality,of gi
一个人和环境的关系就像是历史学家和他的主题间的关系.这个历史学家对于他的历史事实既不是谦卑的奴隶,也不是残暴的统治者.历史学家和他的事实之间的关系在“给予和索取”上是平等的.像很多正在工作的历史学家知道的那样,如果他在思考和写作时没有反映他正在做的,这个历史学家只是忙于不停地在事实上塑造一个历史解释,可能会使一件事凌驾于其他事情之上.
人的关系,以他的环境是历史学家有关他的主题。历史学家是冥间不起眼的奴隶,也不是专横的主人,他的事实。历史学家之间的关系和他的事实,是一种平等的给予和利用。作为历史学家的任何工作都知道,如果他停下来反映他是因为他认为,写做,历史学家是从事一个成型的事实,他的解释,他解释他的事实,持续不断的过程。这是不可能的优先分配到一个比其他。
The relation of man to his envi...
全部展开
人的关系,以他的环境是历史学家有关他的主题。历史学家是冥间不起眼的奴隶,也不是专横的主人,他的事实。历史学家之间的关系和他的事实,是一种平等的给予和利用。作为历史学家的任何工作都知道,如果他停下来反映他是因为他认为,写做,历史学家是从事一个成型的事实,他的解释,他解释他的事实,持续不断的过程。这是不可能的优先分配到一个比其他。
The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme. The historian is nether the humble slave, nor the tyrannical master, of his facts. The relation between the historian and his facts is one of equality, of give-and-take. As any working historian knows, if he stops to reflect what he is doing as he thinks and writes, the historian is engaged on a continuous process of moulding his facts to his interpretation and his interpretation to his facts. It is impossible to assign primacy to one over the other
收起
答案:是人的关系,以他的环境是历史学家有关他的主题。历史学家是冥间不起眼的奴隶,也不是专横的主人,他的事实。历史学家之间的关系和他的事实,是一种平等的给予和利用。作为历史学家的任何工作都知道,如果他停下来反映他是因为他认为,写做,历史学家是从事一个成型的事实,他的解释,他解释他的事实,持续不断的过程。这是不可能的优先分配到一个比其他...
全部展开
答案:是人的关系,以他的环境是历史学家有关他的主题。历史学家是冥间不起眼的奴隶,也不是专横的主人,他的事实。历史学家之间的关系和他的事实,是一种平等的给予和利用。作为历史学家的任何工作都知道,如果他停下来反映他是因为他认为,写做,历史学家是从事一个成型的事实,他的解释,他解释他的事实,持续不断的过程。这是不可能的优先分配到一个比其他
收起