法律外文文献翻译 急!A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may produc

法律外文文献翻译 急!A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may produc
法律外文文献翻译 急!
A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may produce illegal contracts, the discussion in this lesson will focus on three broad categories of such contracts: (1) contracts in violation of positive law, (2) contracts expressly made void by statute, and (3) contracts contrary to public policy.
1. Contracts in violation of positive law. A contract which provides for the commission of a crime or whose nature tends to induce the commission of a crime is illegal. Similarly, a contract which cannot be performed without the commission of a tort is illegal; however, the fact that a tort is committed during the performance of a contract does not in itself make the contract illegal.
2. Contracts made illegal by statutes. Statutes which expressly deal with the legality of certain types of contracts may be divided into three groups: (1) criminal statutes, (2) statutes expressly declaring contracts void, and (3) regulatory statutes. Statutes commonly have statutes which either prohibit or regulate wagering. Generally, wagering contracts are illegal and will not be enforced. Wagering contracts should be distinguished from contracts to shift a risk. In a wagering contract, a risk is created for the purpose of bearing it---such as a bet on a football game. A risk-shifting contract---such as an insurance contract---is legal so long as the person purporting to shift the risk actually had the risk. Stock and commodity market transaction entered into in good faith are speculative contracts and not illegal as wagers.
Some common example of statutes declaring certain types of contracts illegal are usury laws and Sunday closing or blue laws. These statutes often make the contracts void and may subject the parties involved to various penalties and forfeitures.
In order to protect the public, states have enacted a wide variety of statutes regulating the conduct of various types of businesses and professions. The most common type of regulation provides for the obtaining of a license before a person, partnership, or corporation engages in a regulated activity such as the practice of law or medicine or the carrying on of a trade such as barbering or plumbing. If a person contracts to perform such a service or engages in a regulated business without first having obtained the required license, any contracts he makes are illegal. Again, however, a distinction must be made between regulatory statutes which require proof of skill and character before the issuance of a license, and those statutes designed to raise revenue and which permit the issuance of a license to anyone who pays a certain, often substantial, fee. The failure to obtain a license required by a revenue-raising statute does not affect the legality of a contract made by the unlicensed person.
不要软件翻的，用软件的话，我就不用求教！！！

法律外文文献翻译 急!A contract is illegal if either its formation or its performance is contrary to the public interest and to public policy. In general, illegal contracts are void. While there is a wide variety of situation which may produc
合同是非法的如果或它的形成或它的表现与国家政策是相反的与公共利益和.总之,非法合同是空的.当有各种各样也许导致非法合同的情况,讨论在这个教训将集中于三个宽广的类别的这样合同:(1) 收缩违反正面法律,(2) 合同明确地做的空隙由法规,并且(3) 收缩相背与国家政策.1.合同违反正面法律.提供罪行委员会或自然倾向于导致罪行的委员会的合同是非法的.同样,无法执行没有侵权行为的委员会的合同是非法的; 但是,事实侵权行为做在合同的表现期间本质上不使合同非法.2.合同使非法由法规.明确地应付某些类型合法合同的法规也许被划分成三个小组:(1) 罪犯法规,(2) 法规明确地宣称合同无效,和(3) 管理法规.法规共同地有或禁止或调控wagering 的法规.通常,wagering 的合同是非法的,不会被强制执行.Wagering 合同应该是卓越的从合同转移风险.在一个wagering 的合同,风险被创造为负担它这样的目的作为赌注在橄榄球赛.风险转移合同这样因为保险合同是法律的只要人声称转移风险实际上有风险.股票和商品市场交易被输入入真诚是投机合同和不非法的作为赌注.法规某一共同的例子宣称某些类型合同非法是高利贷法律和星期天关闭或清教徒法规.这些法规做合同无效和经常也许服从介入的党对各种各样的惩罚和没收.为了保护公众,状态制定各种各样的法规调控各种各样的类型品行企业和行业.最共同的类型章程提供获得执照在人之前,合作,或公司参与被调控的活动譬如法律或医学实践或继续贸易譬如barbering 或测量深度.如果人收缩进行这样服务或首先参与被调控的事务没有被获得必需的执照,他做的所有合同是非法的.再,然而,必须被区分在要求技巧和字符证明在执照的发行之前的管理法规,并且那些法规之间被设计培养并且允许执照发行对任何人支付确定,经常坚固,费的收支.疏忽获得执照由一个收支培养的法规必需不影响合同的合法由无执照的人做.

楼上的哥们，直接用机器翻，翻得真烂！

我来尝试一下 不用机器翻
一个合同如果其形式或者其履行违反了公共利益或者公共政策，就是非法的。一般来说，非法的合同是无效的。在很多种情况下都可能导致产生非法合同，本课集中讨论这类合同中的三大类：（1）违反实在法的合同；（2）制定法明文规定无效的合同；（3）违反公共政策的合同。
1，违反实在法的合同。一个合同如果其制定是为了实施犯罪或者该合同的性质可能导致犯罪的实施，那么它就是非法...

全部展开

我来尝试一下 不用机器翻
一个合同如果其形式或者其履行违反了公共利益或者公共政策，就是非法的。一般来说，非法的合同是无效的。在很多种情况下都可能导致产生非法合同，本课集中讨论这类合同中的三大类：（1）违反实在法的合同；（2）制定法明文规定无效的合同；（3）违反公共政策的合同。
1，违反实在法的合同。一个合同如果其制定是为了实施犯罪或者该合同的性质可能导致犯罪的实施，那么它就是非法的。简单地说，一个合同如果不通过侵权就不能实施，那么它就是非法的。然而，在履行合同的过程中实施了侵权行为的事实本身并不能导致合同非法。
2，制定法规定的非法合同。明文规定涉及到一定类别合同合法性的制定法可以划分为三类：（1）刑事法律；（2）明确规定合同无效的制定法；（3）制定法规章。制定法通常都有条文禁止或者规范赌博性合同。通常情况下，赌博性合同是无效的并且不能执行。赌博性合同应该有别于变动风险的合同。在一个赌博性合同中，承担合同时风险就产生了。一个风险变动的合同（比如一个保险合同），即使试图转嫁风险的人真的遭遇了风险也是合法的。证券和商品交易市场以诚信为基础的交易是推测性合同，并不像赌博性合同那样是非法的。
规定一定类型的合同是非法的一些常见的制定法有高利贷法、主日歇业法或者蓝色法。这些法规通常导致合同无效，并且给予涉案当事人各种处罚或者没收财物。
为了保护公众利益，政府颁布了一系列的法规去规范各种类型的经济和行业行为。最常见的规章是那些规定个人、合伙或者公司要想从事律师或者医生或者从事理发或者测量，必须先取得相应的许可。任何人如果没有事先取得相应的许可而订立合同提供服务或者从事相应的交易，他所订立的合同都是非法的。然而同样需要区分的是，那些颁发许可之前需要技能和特征证明的规范性法规，以及那些为了增加财政收入而允许经过交纳一定许可费（通常是高额的）向任何人颁发许可的规范性法规。在后者情况下，没有取得许可的非许可方签订的合同不影响合同的效力。
呵呵 好长一段文字啊 敲字都敲的累 记得给我加分哦

收起