to which在这里怎么解释?A draft of a U.N. Security Council resolution being circulated Tuesday called for "full and immediate compliance with the cease-fire agreement to which the parties have subscribed" and the immediate withdrawal of Russian

to which在这里怎么解释?A draft of a U.N. Security Council resolution being circulated Tuesday called for "full and immediate compliance with the cease-fire agreement to which the parties have subscribed" and the immediate withdrawal of Russian
to which在这里怎么解释?
A draft of a U.N. Security Council resolution being circulated Tuesday called for "full and immediate compliance with the cease-fire agreement to which the parties have subscribed" and the immediate withdrawal of Russian forces.
感觉to是多余的,如果不多余,在这里充当什么成分?
the parties have subscribed就是agreement,在还后当定语感觉比较正确,但多了to,to是和compliance连接吗?那中间的with the cease-fire agreement就很怪异.介词to也值得商榷.
根据我找到的资料，这里可以改用that，但改了that，to就不能提前了。下面都是正确的：
agreement which the parties have subscribed to
agreement that the parties have subscribed to
agreement the parties have subscribed to
很感谢几位回答，是否有异议？
呵呵，Arabella1120 如果有兴趣，我还有一个疑问，希望找到答案。
就是固定动词短语介词不能提前，比如look for，This is the book you are looking for不能说成This is the book for which you are looking，但是据说以前按古老的非常严谨的语法规范，介词是不能放在句尾的，那个时候如果想表达这样的意思该怎么办？还是说“固定动词短语介词不能提前”这条语法是在语法规范放松以后才有的？

to which在这里怎么解释?A draft of a U.N. Security Council resolution being circulated Tuesday called for "full and immediate compliance with the cease-fire agreement to which the parties have subscribed" and the immediate withdrawal of Russian
这里to是跟不及物动词subscribe一起的,subscribe to表示同意,to后面的which指代前面的the cease-fire agreement
call for的宾语之一就是名词compliance,其动词形式comply是不及物动词,后面要接with表示遵从遵守,所以这里也接with
所以“.”中间这句意思是 全面立即遵守双方已同意的停火协议
————————————————————————————
离开学校后好久没这样钻研语法了,好玩
subscribe一定要跟介词to搭,而介词后只能用which
to既可以放在which前面,也可以放在subscribe后面,放在subscribe后面时前面可用that
当先行词是表示原因或方式的名词时,可以用that引导定语从句,相当于介词+which,that可以省略.
嗯,完全同意楼主的意见,
——————————————————————
我是不知道以前古老的严谨的语法规范有没有规定介词不能放在句尾,而且也比较难找到
嗯,我觉得吧,这个如果不是做学术研究,对于我们现在用英语是没什么意义的
弄清楚为什么会规定“固定动词短语介词不能提前”才是重要的
这条语法应该不是是否在语法规范放松以后才有的
之所以会有这条规定,我想是为了避免一些固定短语拆开后会产生的歧义
(1) This is the book（which /that）I am looking for.(T)
(2) This is the book for which I am looking.(F)
这里先不论语法对错,(1)的意思是这是我在找的那本书,而(2)则变成了“这是那本书,为了它,我在看”.这样就有歧义了,所以才会有固定动词短语介词不能提前这条语法吧

我认为to不多余。subscribed是不及物动词，后面必须加介词才能跟宾语。而定语从句中，介词一般放在关系副词前，所以就变成了to which。

把这个从句的句式还原就是.the parties have subscribed to the cease-fire agreement.
而在原句中agreement后面的从句都是修饰 cease-fire agreement的
因为在本来的句式里,subscribed与cease-fire agreement需要介词 to 来连接,而这种带介词的的定语从句,介词都要放到前面...

全部展开

把这个从句的句式还原就是.the parties have subscribed to the cease-fire agreement.
而在原句中agreement后面的从句都是修饰 cease-fire agreement的
因为在本来的句式里,subscribed与cease-fire agreement需要介词 to 来连接,而这种带介词的的定语从句,介词都要放到前面来.
如果不放,是 with the cease-fire agreement which the parties have subscribed to.
把to 放在最后不符合英语的习惯,所以要提前.一般这种需要提前的情况都是跟which联系在一起的.
看到补充,我想说的就是,一般这种句末是不及物动词的情况,前面从句必然是形容一个名词的,所以据我所知,好象一般都是用用WHICH WHERE 之类的词,如果用其他的,应该也是要提前,不过好象习惯上不那么用,呵呵,反正语法这东西有点玄,我也不是能说很清楚,但是楼主,有时候别太在意语法,凭语感有时候更能解决问题,并且不会让自己迷惑.
加油吧!楼主

收起

此处的 to 不是多余的，to which =to the cease-fire agreement ; 此处"to "是 subscribed 要求的，即：subscribed to = (双方）赞成的。可看成：the parties have subscribed to the cease-fire agreement =
双方赞成的停火协议。
整句译成：
联合国...

全部展开

此处的 to 不是多余的，to which =to the cease-fire agreement ; 此处"to "是 subscribed 要求的，即：subscribed to = (双方）赞成的。可看成：the parties have subscribed to the cease-fire agreement =
双方赞成的停火协议。
整句译成：
联合国安理会星期二正在翰旋的要求”全面和马上遵守双方赞成的停火协议“解决草案，并马上撤出俄国军队。

收起