gre范文中的问题请问Query whether research whose benefits are immediate and predictable can break any new ground,or whether it can be considered"research" at all.怎么感觉只有主语,该怎么理解?还有个问题,Money spent on research
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：六六作业网 时间：2024/12/25 02:33:37
gre范文中的问题请问Query whether research whose benefits are immediate and predictable can break any new ground,or whether it can be considered"research" at all.怎么感觉只有主语,该怎么理解?还有个问题,Money spent on research
gre范文中的问题
请问Query whether research whose benefits are immediate and predictable can break any new ground,or whether it can be considered"research" at all.怎么感觉只有主语,该怎么理解?
还有个问题,Money spent on research is generally money well invested.这话第二个money怎么理解,是多余的吗?
gre范文中的问题请问Query whether research whose benefits are immediate and predictable can break any new ground,or whether it can be considered"research" at all.怎么感觉只有主语,该怎么理解?还有个问题,Money spent on research
Query whether research (whose benefits are immediate and predictable) can break any new ground,or whether it can be considered"research" at all.
恩,这其实就是一个名次QUERY,其他后面的whether都是修饰这个"询问"的.你仔细看看,是不是少了看谓语?
第二个MONEY不是多余的
我用中文给你解释更清楚
如果没有第二个MONEY,就是
用来研究的钱是好的投资
对吗?逻辑不正确吧,钱怎么能是投资呢?
所以正确的是
用来研究的钱,是一种妥善投资的钱.
钱还是钱,只是有一个状语"好的投资"修饰了