非限制性定语从句的先行词全都是就近修饰吗the growth of knowledge followed a kind of compound-interest law,which was greatly enhanced by the invention of printing .我原本以为先行词是就近的,修饰“a kind of compound-int

来源：学生作业帮助网编辑：六六作业网时间：2025/01/22 20:45:41

非限制性定语从句的先行词全都是就近修饰吗thegrowthofknowledgefollowedakindofcompound-interestlaw,whichwasgreatlyenhancedb

非限制性定语从句的先行词全都是就近修饰吗the growth of knowledge followed a kind of compound-interest law,which was greatly enhanced by the invention of printing .我原本以为先行词是就近的,修饰“a kind of compound-int
非限制性定语从句的先行词全都是就近修饰吗
the growth of knowledge followed a kind of compound-interest law,which was greatly enhanced by the invention of printing .我原本以为先行词是就近的,修饰“a kind of compound-interest law”可是这句话不知道为什么修饰“the growth of knowledge ”是不是还得根本具体意思来判断.

非限制性定语从句的先行词全都是就近修饰吗the growth of knowledge followed a kind of compound-interest law,which was greatly enhanced by the invention of printing .我原本以为先行词是就近的,修饰“a kind of compound-int
是修饰 the growth of knowledge
原则上是,不管是限制性的还是非限制性的,都应紧跟在“先行词”后.
但也有例外情况：
1、不得已的情形：先行词 +关系密切又无法拆开的插入语或后置定语短语 + 定语从句.
你的这个例子就是.
2、无聊的考试题,出题人故意插入,起干扰考生的.
忠告：不管谁写的这类句子,都是蹩脚的英语 (bad English),
自己尽量不要写这样的句子.
我更愿意这么写：A kind of compound-interest law took effect before the growth of knowledge ,which was greatly enhanced by the invention of printing.
比较一下,你喜欢哪一句?

一般来说，定语从句的先行词就紧挨在从句前面，主要还是要看意思哦