求法律英文翻中文求这篇英文的中文翻译THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVESI.MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES CONSUMER ADVOCACY LEGAL SYSTEMS The type of consumer advocacy found in any juris

求法律英文翻中文求这篇英文的中文翻译THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVESI.MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES CONSUMER ADVOCACY LEGAL SYSTEMS The type of consumer advocacy found in any juris
求法律英文翻中文
求这篇英文的中文翻译
THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES
I.MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES CONSUMER ADVOCACY LEGAL SYSTEMS
The type of consumer advocacy found in any jurisdiction is a function of a complex set of factors unique to that jurisdiction.Even the Canadian experience varies significantly from province to province.However,to the extent that one can generalize at the national level,including the civil law system in the Province of Quebec,this article will attempt to outline the key differences in consumer litigation between Canada and the United States.
The first and,perhaps,the most important factor,is what economists refer to as economies of scale.Since most consumer litigation is financed by consumer groups,the relative size and wealth of these groups is important when comparing consumer litigation between the two countries.
The United States has a population of approximately two hundred and seventy million persons,and Canada approximately ten percent of that.If one-half of one percent of the United States' population contributed financially to a consumer group,that would be approximately 1.3 million people.In Canada,that would translate to only 130,000 people.Assume equal per capita contributions.The United States is capable of supporting a magazine of the quality of Consumers' Reports,with its expensive tests of consumer durables,(e.g.cars),and Consumers' Union,which can maintain a substantial law office in Washington.By comparison,the only Canadian consumer group of any size,the Consumer's Association of Canada (CAC),has a magazine printed on cheap paper,and a testing program which can barely afford to pay for testing household cleansers,bicycles,and inexpensive toys.The Canadian federal government has rescued CAC twice from bankruptcy due to losses incurred by the magazine.The CAC used to have one or two full-time lawyers at its head office in Ottawa,supported entirely by government grants.However,because of financial problems,the CAC legal program has now been discontinued.Economies of scale in Canada prevent consumer groups from funding any significant litigation in the courts because they simply do not have the money.

求法律英文翻中文求这篇英文的中文翻译THE ROLE OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND OTHER ALTERNATIVESI.MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES CONSUMER ADVOCACY LEGAL SYSTEMS The type of consumer advocacy found in any juris
公共利益诉讼和其他选择的角色
I.加拿大人和美国消费者拥护法制系统之间的主要区别 拥护在所有司法找到消费者的The类型是因素复杂的形势的作用独特对那司法.加拿大经验从省极大变化到省.然而,在某种程度上一个人可能推断在国家级,包括在魁北克的省的民法系统,这篇文章将试图概述在消费者诉讼上的关键性区别在加拿大和美国之间.
The首先,并且,或许,重要因素,是什么经济学家提到作为经济尺度.因为多数消费者诉讼由用户组提供经费,相对大小和财富这些小组是重要的,当比较在二个国家之间时的消费者诉讼.
The美国有人口大约二百和七十百万个人和加拿大大约那的百分之十.如果美国的人口的百分之一的一半财政造成了用户组,那会是大约1.3百万人民.在加拿大,那只将翻译为130,000个人.假设人均相等的贡献.美国能够支持消费者的报告的质量的杂志,与耐用消费品,(即汽车)和消费者协会它昂贵的测试,可能维护一个坚固律师事务所在华盛顿.比较起来,唯一的加拿大用户组所有大小,加拿大(CAC)的消费者协会,有在便宜的纸打印的一本杂志和可能几乎没有支付测试家庭清洁剂、自行车和低廉玩具的一个测试程序.加拿大联邦政府两次抢救了CAC从破产由于杂志导致的损失.被用于的CAC在它的总店有一两位全时律师在渥太华,完全地支持由政府津贴.然而,由于财政问题,CAC法律节目现在被中断了.因为他们没有金钱,经济尺度在加拿大防止用户组资助在法院的所有重大诉讼.