OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules...OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules for checking are just a couple of simple constraints without the cross Aggregate border problems,I would prefe
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/19 15:11:25
OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules...OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules for checking are just a couple of simple constraints without the cross Aggregate border problems,I would prefe
OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules...
OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules for checking are just a couple of simple constraints without the cross Aggregate border problems,I would prefer to apply the principle discussed earlier:
Aggregate 聚合
OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules...OK,"ridiculous" is too strong a word,but if we assume that the rules for checking are just a couple of simple constraints without the cross Aggregate border problems,I would prefe
好吧,ridiculous可笑的(确实)是有点雷人,但是如果我们认为复核(的规则)仅仅是(验算/检查)几个简单约束(条件)不发生整体边界问题,我宁愿采用早先探讨过的原则
你是在开会吗?
太可笑了?什么?你说这可笑?奥,对不起,我不该说可笑,不过,如果...
把前面一句话给我