GMAT OG12 CR63题求解When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects aredissoci

GMAT OG12 CR63题求解When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects aredissoci
GMAT OG12 CR63题求解
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,
they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are
dissociated into separate parts,and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer,"Yes"?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
正确答案是A,看了很多解答,求完整翻译和解答,
这个题是问这些选项哪个是削弱科学家观点的么。

GMAT OG12 CR63题求解When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,they reply,"No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects aredissoci
催眠对象被告知他们是聋子,但当问他们是否能听到催眠师的时候,他们回答：“不”
一些理论家试图解释的理由是,这是自我催眠科目分为不同的部分的结果,这里是聋子的部分与答复部分相分离.
以下哪项挑战表明,在试图解释,最严重的弱点?
（一）为什么不答复,“是”?
（二）为何所观察到的事实需要的特殊的解释?
（三）为什么实验对象接受催眠师的建议,认为他们是聋了吗?
（四）为什么催眠所有的科目都以同样的方式作出反应?
（e）为什么在自我催眠者中,分离出来的部分都是一样的?
这些实验对象在催眠过程中被告知是无法听到声音的,但当有人问话的时候他们按照被告知的逻辑做出了反应.即：他们认为自己是聋子,无法听到声音.
事实是他们仍旧能够听到声音.最大的矛盾就是,既然听不到声音为什么还会做出反应.注意题目是要求MOSTserious weakness
注意看结论,寻求与结论相反的答案.
结论认为这个现象是失聪与reply相剥离的结果,那么推翻这个结论就是两者没有剥离.即,听到便说听到,Then因该回答yes.

好久没做gmat题了，呵呵已经忘了这是哪种逻辑错误。
不过首先，我觉得lz可以很清楚的看出bcde错的太离谱，不是么？再说说a选项把，科学家说被催眠的部分和回答的部分没有联系，但事实上回答的部分说的是听不见，也就是接受了催眠的信息。
反过来也就是说 没有联系→不知道自己被催眠→回答的部分说听得见（yes）
回答lz的问题补充：是的 是问那个最有力的削弱了，gmat有个最...

全部展开

好久没做gmat题了，呵呵已经忘了这是哪种逻辑错误。
不过首先，我觉得lz可以很清楚的看出bcde错的太离谱，不是么？再说说a选项把，科学家说被催眠的部分和回答的部分没有联系，但事实上回答的部分说的是听不见，也就是接受了催眠的信息。
反过来也就是说 没有联系→不知道自己被催眠→回答的部分说听得见（yes）
回答lz的问题补充：是的 是问那个最有力的削弱了，gmat有个最大的特点就是不论是逻辑还是语法都是选最对的答案，正确的答案往往很好几个

收起

不用那么复杂的推理。这是老题了，这种题目不会常考。做CR你要用排除法，别找对的，找不对的，因为他好几个可能都是对的，但是只有一个是最符合题意的。很明显BCDE不可能，只能选A.找相关性。