剑桥4 test1 writing task1 帮忙改错 谢谢The table illustrates the percentage of different types of impoverished household in Australia in 1999. According to the information given in the table,we can find that up to 21% of family with sole p

剑桥4 test1 writing task1 帮忙改错 谢谢The table illustrates the percentage of different types of impoverished household in Australia in 1999. According to the information given in the table,we can find that up to 21% of family with sole p
剑桥4 test1 writing task1 帮忙改错 谢谢
The table illustrates the percentage of different types of impoverished household in Australia in 1999.
According to the information given in the table,we can find that up to 21% of family with sole parents,taking the first place.Family which consist of single and no children saw 19%,filling the second position.It is noticeable that the proportion of people from household which is made up of couple with children(12%) was 2 times as many as family with single aged person(6%).Aged people were generally less likely to be poor,due to the fact that aged couple family living in poverty account for only 4%.And the percentage of individuals from family with couple had no children occupy 7% in Australia in 1999.
Overall,it is obvious that people from family with children is more likely to living in poverty.
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_62121bcf0100eou2.html
题在这里

剑桥4 test1 writing task1 帮忙改错 谢谢The table illustrates the percentage of different types of impoverished household in Australia in 1999. According to the information given in the table,we can find that up to 21% of family with sole p
The table illustrates the percentage of different types of impoverished household in Australia in 1999.
According to the information given in the table,we can find that up to 21% of family(改families) with sole parents,taking(改took) the first place.Family(改families) which consist(改consisted) of single and no children saw 19%,filling the second position.It is noticeable that the proportion of people from (改a) household which is(改was) made up of (改a) couple with children(12%) was 2 times as many as family(改families) with (改a) single aged person(6%).Aged people were generally less likely to be poor,due to the fact that aged couple family(改families) living in poverty account(改accounted) for only 4%.And the percentage of individuals from family(改families) with (改a) couple had(改having) no children occupy(改occupied) 7% in Australia in 1999.
Overall,it is obvious that people from family(改families) with children is(改are) more likely to living(改live) in poverty.