有没有人可以讲解一下Tpo2的综合写作……
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/25 01:23:48
有没有人可以讲解一下Tpo2的综合写作……
有没有人可以讲解一下Tpo2的综合写作……
有没有人可以讲解一下Tpo2的综合写作……
ETS推出的TPO系列是各位考生在备战新托福考试时非常重要的资料之一,下面是新托福名师推荐的TPO综合写作中的满分范文,希望能帮助许多刚刚接触新托福的朋友们了解和熟悉综合写作的方式和套路,拿到新托福综合写作的高分.
新托福考试TPO2综合写作高分范文(ETS 满分版):
The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened in reality.
First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn’t work hard but got recognition for the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who worked hard were not given recognition they should have gotten. In other words, they weren’t given the opportunity to “shine”. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates.
Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are more responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in decision making. Groups needed more time for meetings, which are necessary procedures in decision making. This was another place where experience contradicted theory.
Third, influential people might emerge and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and might become less flexible in its thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.
Rating annotation:
Once you can read past what seem to be the results of poor typing, this Benchmark 5 does an excellent job of presenting the points about the contribution and recognition of group members as well as about speed of group decisions. The final paragraph contains one noticeable error (“influent”), which is then used correctly two sentences later (“influential”). Overall, this is a successful response and scored within (though perhaps not at the top of) the 5 level.