sat一道真题iseIn 1991 B miitary officials arrested dissident politicial leader Aung SAn,thereby preventing her from leaving Burma for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo答案是划线for accepting错了leave for不是固定结构吗

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/19 03:57:01
sat一道真题iseIn1991BmiitaryofficialsarresteddissidentpoliticialleaderAungSAn,therebypreventingherfromle

sat一道真题iseIn 1991 B miitary officials arrested dissident politicial leader Aung SAn,thereby preventing her from leaving Burma for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo答案是划线for accepting错了leave for不是固定结构吗
sat一道真题ise
In 1991 B miitary officials arrested dissident politicial leader Aung SAn,thereby preventing her from leaving Burma for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo
答案是划线for accepting错了
leave for不是固定结构吗

sat一道真题iseIn 1991 B miitary officials arrested dissident politicial leader Aung SAn,thereby preventing her from leaving Burma for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo答案是划线for accepting错了leave for不是固定结构吗
所谓的固定搭配是最不负责任的说法.SAT或GMAT的语法题本质上都应该根据句子的意思去做.
这句话应该表达的意思是“1991年military officials arrested了dissident political 昂山,以防止她离开burma去奥斯陆领nobel奖.”
这里用for accepting的话就会产生歧义,即arrested她是因为她【已经】领了nobel奖(即因为她领奖的这个行为而arrest她),或arrested她是因为她【将要】去领nobel奖(即因为她想去领奖的这个念头而arrest她).你应该能读出这个歧义吧?
如楼上所说,将for accepting改成to accept,句子就没有问题了.
这敏/感/词太多了.我去.

for accepting要改为to accept 用不定式表示目的