英语翻译The commonality between Peirce and William James,another early pragmatist and the author of Pragmatism (1975),comes from the instrumentality of their ideas.That is,Peirce and James stressed the evaluation of the rightness or wrongness of

英语翻译The commonality between Peirce and William James,another early pragmatist and the author of Pragmatism (1975),comes from the instrumentality of their ideas.That is,Peirce and James stressed the evaluation of the rightness or wrongness of
英语翻译
The commonality between Peirce and William James,another early pragmatist and the author of Pragmatism (1975),comes from the instrumentality of their ideas.That is,Peirce and James stressed the evaluation of the rightness or wrongness of an idea on how well it worked.Their work can be linked to the English utilitarians as it also brought philosophy down from the stars (metaphysics) and focused it on the social realm (ethics).Indeed,James’ connection to J.S.Mill is made evident by the dedication of his Pragmatism to the famed utilitarian.This displacing of metaphysics in the early period of pragmatism links researchers to a similar and much more recent tectonic shift in philosophy.
This change in contemporary philosophy came in Richard Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979).In it,Rorty argued that philosophy as a method should be removed from its high pedestal and should eschew its role as the adjudicator and arbiter of disputes among other intellectual disciplines.This momentous volume’s conclusions were largely ignored by many of Rorty’s former analytical colleagues; however,to other scholars searching for a different view of philosophy,his work was a revelation.The work demarcates a line in Rorty’s own work that mirrors the break pragmatism made with metaphysics.It also marks Rorty’s emancipation from the analytical tradition and sets up his many fruitful years exploring both old and new pragmatism.

英语翻译The commonality between Peirce and William James,another early pragmatist and the author of Pragmatism (1975),comes from the instrumentality of their ideas.That is,Peirce and James stressed the evaluation of the rightness or wrongness of
雅士之间的共性和威廉•詹姆斯,另一个早期的实用主义者和作者的实用主义色彩(1975),来自靠自己的想法.也就是说,雅士和詹姆斯·强调对是错的评价的错误非常有效的点子.他们的工作能被连接到英语utilitarians,因为它也带来了哲学的恒星(了),把精力放在形而上学的社会领域(道德规范).事实上,詹姆斯连接到j .s .磨是由他的奉献显而易见的实用主义,著名的功利主义.这种取代的形而上学的实用主义色彩初期链接科研人员发现相似,更近期构造的转变,在哲学.
这一变化在当代哲学的理查德•罗蒂进来了哲学与自然之镜》(1979年).在这篇文章中,罗蒂认为哲学作为方法应迁离底座高,应该避开它当作判决者和仲裁官间的争端其他知识学科.这项重大的体的结论是在很大程度上忽略了的许多推崇的前分析的同事;然而,为后续研究者寻找有不同的看法,他的工作是哲学的启示.工作:一辆接一辆地在demarcates自己的作品,反映了打破实用主义与哲学.亦是解放的不从分析传统和建立了他的许多硕果累累的两年,探索新老实用