请帮忙翻译个句子 Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and specie
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/26 15:03:02
请帮忙翻译个句子 Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and specie
请帮忙翻译个句子 Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much.
Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy.
请先帮忙翻译一下,然后能讲一下最好
请帮忙翻译个句子 Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much.Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and specie
即使是一个在生态上有效得多的工业体系,如果变得更大的话变得,也会产生更多的浪费总量,也会比更小的、生态有效性耕地的经济(体系)破坏更多的(动物)栖息地和物种.
使用了虚拟语气were it to...,主语是industrial system谓语有两个:could generate(waste宾语)和(could)destoy(habitat and species).more .than 比较结构,
即使在生态有效性上更高,但由于基数的庞大,产生破坏的总量就越大.小的经济体虽然效率不一定高,但基数小,产生的污染与破坏就更小.
任何工业或经济体系都会有污染,程度不同而已,如果片面强调其技术改进会降低污染率,认为这就能够成为规模无限制扩大的理由,那是站不住脚的,因为,随着技术的增加,污染量会越来越大,总是无限靠近或者超过生态承受能力,最终导致悲剧的.要保护生态,必须在改善与提高效率的同时,对体系总量进行合理的限制.
相比于一个较小的、生态效益没那么高的经济体来说,哪怕是一个生态效益远远比它高的工业系统,如果后者发展壮大,就会比前者产生更多的浪费,并毁灭更多的栖息地和物种。
调了一下语序,但句子太长,还是有些绕,看懂意思应该没问题。...
全部展开
相比于一个较小的、生态效益没那么高的经济体来说,哪怕是一个生态效益远远比它高的工业系统,如果后者发展壮大,就会比前者产生更多的浪费,并毁灭更多的栖息地和物种。
调了一下语序,但句子太长,还是有些绕,看懂意思应该没问题。
收起