不定式做定语和定语从句有什么不同?我在新概念里发现,有的名词用定语从句修饰.有的却可以用不定式修饰.例如 A CAT'S ABILITY TO SURVIVE FALLS IS BASED ON FACT.和THE ORDER TO ABANDON SHIP WAS GIVEN.这2句都
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/12/25 21:40:45
不定式做定语和定语从句有什么不同?我在新概念里发现,有的名词用定语从句修饰.有的却可以用不定式修饰.例如 A CAT'S ABILITY TO SURVIVE FALLS IS BASED ON FACT.和THE ORDER TO ABANDON SHIP WAS GIVEN.这2句都
不定式做定语和定语从句有什么不同?
我在新概念里发现,有的名词用定语从句修饰.有的却可以用不定式修饰.
例如 A CAT'S ABILITY TO SURVIVE FALLS IS BASED ON FACT.
和THE ORDER TO ABANDON SHIP WAS GIVEN.这2句都是不定式修饰名词的
请问.它们可以转化为一个定语从句吗.比如.THE ORDER WHICH ABANDONDED SHIP WAS GIVEN .可以这样改吗.如果不可以请说出理由..
还有.有的名词后面用介词短语修饰的也可以用定语从句吧?比如.THE MAN ON THE BOAT.能说成是THE MAN WHO IS ON THE BOAT吧?
谢谢wangsining521.我还有点问题请你帮忙一下.就是.如何分别名词加TO不定式子是否是同位语,或是互相修饰的定语中心词关系?比如I WANT AN APPLE TO EAT.这个应该就是TO不定式修饰名词APPLE吧?怎么区别两者呢?使用上有讲究吗
不定式做定语和定语从句有什么不同?我在新概念里发现,有的名词用定语从句修饰.有的却可以用不定式修饰.例如 A CAT'S ABILITY TO SURVIVE FALLS IS BASED ON FACT.和THE ORDER TO ABANDON SHIP WAS GIVEN.这2句都
1.The order to abandon ship was given.
the order 就是:abandon ship,命令就是弃船,它们是同位语而不是互相修饰的定语中心词关系
原句可写成:
The order that we should abandon ship was given.(that引导同位语从句)
The order which abandoned ship was given.(x)
引导词若在从句中充当主语,句子意思错误,变成主语命令为施动者,它去放弃船,原句本意为:弃船的命令已下达.
2.The man on the boat=the man who is on the boat
I want an apple to eat.
to eat 不定式充当目的状语
不定式是非谓语动词,是高考、中考的重要考点.