求改下面一段英文,太多错误了在第三个案例中,超市对张先生不承担责任,建筑公司应对张先生受到的损害承担无过错和替代责任.原因是苏是建筑公司的工人,他和建筑公司是存在着劳动关系
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：六六作业网 时间：2024/12/24 04:08:22
求改下面一段英文,太多错误了在第三个案例中,超市对张先生不承担责任,建筑公司应对张先生受到的损害承担无过错和替代责任.原因是苏是建筑公司的工人,他和建筑公司是存在着劳动关系
求改下面一段英文,太多错误了
在第三个案例中,超市对张先生不承担责任,建筑公司应对张先生受到的损害承担无过错和替代责任.原因是苏是建筑公司的工人,他和建筑公司是存在着劳动关系的,并且苏是在工作期间受伤并且造成顾客王先生的人身损害,故建筑公司应承担无过错替代责任.而超市既没管理上的过失,苏也不是超市的员工,所以超市可以以无过错理由抗辩.
In the third case,the supermarket needn’t have to bear the vicarious reliability but the construction company.Su is the employee sent by construction,sue has the employment relations with construction company,in addition,Su get injured in the course of employment and caused the injure of Mr.zhang,so construction company should committed the vicarious reliability without fault.For supermarket,there isn’t any management false,Su isn’t the employee from it,so supermarket can defense by without false.
求改下面一段英文,太多错误了在第三个案例中,超市对张先生不承担责任,建筑公司应对张先生受到的损害承担无过错和替代责任.原因是苏是建筑公司的工人,他和建筑公司是存在着劳动关系
in the third case,the supermarket need not have to bear the vicarious reliability but the cconstruction company.Sue is a construcion worker,she has employment relations with the construction company.In addition,Sue was injured physically during her employment and caused the injury of Mr.Zhang,so the construction company should commit the vacarious reliability without fault.For the supermarket,there is no mamnagement faulty,and since Sue is not a employer,the supermarket is not at fault.
选我~
改不了，直接delete叫人重翻吧，既不像机译又不是人译。