英语翻译]in our recent decision in bushkin assoc.inc.v.Raytheon co.,393 mass.622,632-634,473 N.E.2d 662(1985),we adopted the general principles advanced in the restatement (second) of conflict of laws (1971) ,with respect to the resolution of con

英语翻译]in our recent decision in bushkin assoc.inc.v.Raytheon co.,393 mass.622,632-634,473 N.E.2d 662(1985),we adopted the general principles advanced in the restatement (second) of conflict of laws (1971) ,with respect to the resolution of con
英语翻译
]in our recent decision in bushkin assoc.inc.v.Raytheon co.,393 mass.622,632-634,473 N.E.2d 662(1985),we adopted the general principles advanced in the restatement (second) of conflict of laws (1971) ,with respect to the resolution of conflicts problems involving contracts.Section 191 of the restatement provides that the law to be applied to a contract involving the sale of a chattel is “the local law of the state where under the terms of the contract the seller is to deliver the chattel unless,with respect to the particular issue ,some other state has a more significant relationship under the principles stated in &6 to the transaction and the parties.” we believe that this rule is warranted on grounds that “livery is the most significant stage of the sales transaction,” restatement (second)of conflict of laws ,supra at 191,aomment e,and that “he rule also furthers the values of certainty ,predictability and uniformity of result.” Id.This rule is also consistent with our traditional emphasis on place of delivery in cases involving conflict of laws with respect to the sale of goods.Finally,restatement(second) ,supra at &191 ,provides the flexibility which characterizes the modern approach of the law of the jurisdiction with the most significant relationship to the transaction,&191 requires that we refer to the general “choice influencing considerations”,bushkin assoc.,inc.v.Raytheon co.,supra,393 mass.At 631.473 N.E.2d 662,set forth in &6.

英语翻译]in our recent decision in bushkin assoc.inc.v.Raytheon co.,393 mass.622,632-634,473 N.E.2d 662(1985),we adopted the general principles advanced in the restatement (second) of conflict of laws (1971) ,with respect to the resolution of con
]在我们的在bushkin assoc的最近决定.公司v.莱斯隆co.,393大量.622,632-634,473 N.E.第2 662 (1985),我们采取了在再声明推进的一般原则(其次)法律冲突(1971) ,关于冲突问题的决议介入合同的.再声明的第191部分提供法律将被申请于包含动产的销售的合同是在合同条件下卖主将交付动产状态的“the地方法律,除非,关于特殊问题,某一其他状态有一个更加重大的关系在陈述的原则之下在&6对交易,并且parties.”我们相信这个规则被担保,根据“livery是销售交易,”再声明的最重大的阶段(其次)法律冲突,在上在191,aomment e,并且“he规则也促进把握、result.” Id可预测性和均一的价值.这个规则与我们的对交货地点的传统重点也是一致的在介入法律冲突的案件的关于物品销售.终于,再声明(其次),在上在&191,提供描绘司法法律现代方法与最重大的关系的对交易的灵活性,&191要求我们提到影响considerations”的一般“choice,bushkin assoc.公司v.莱斯隆co.,在上,393大量.在631.473 N.E.第2 662,指出在&6.