英语翻译中国系属大陆法系国家,在现时法律渊源中,以成文法为主要法源,不承认判例制度.然而成文法的局限性导致大量法律解释的出现,但仅凭法律解释是不能解决成文法所固有缺陷的.纵观

英语翻译中国系属大陆法系国家,在现时法律渊源中,以成文法为主要法源,不承认判例制度.然而成文法的局限性导致大量法律解释的出现,但仅凭法律解释是不能解决成文法所固有缺陷的.纵观
英语翻译
中国系属大陆法系国家,在现时法律渊源中,以成文法为主要法源,不承认判例制度.然而成文法的局限性导致大量法律解释的出现,但仅凭法律解释是不能解决成文法所固有缺陷的.纵观我国历史,判例也曾经是法律的渊源.法典和判例,作为西方两大法系的代表性特征,近年来随着世界经济交往的扩大而日趋融合.本文通过比较成文法和判例各自的长短,在此基础上提出了两者融合的必要性,并就我国现阶段是否引入判例以及引入判例制度过程中应关注的几个问题简要的谈了一下自己的看法.
如果不能完整翻译,把关键词翻译一下就行了,一定追加五十分!万分万分万分感谢!
中国系属大陆法系国家，它以成文法为其主要法律渊源，且不承认判例制度。然而成文法自身存在局限性，随着社会发展其产生的空白与漏洞必然需要大量法律解释来填补，但仅凭法律解释又不能完全解决成文法固有的缺陷。判例也曾经是法律的渊源。法典和判例，作为西方两大法系的代表性特征，近年来随着世界经济交往的扩大而日趋融合。本文通过比较成文法和判例各自的长短，阐述了两者融合的必要性，并就我国现阶段是否引入判例制度以及引入过程中应关注的几个问题浅谈拙见。

英语翻译中国系属大陆法系国家,在现时法律渊源中,以成文法为主要法源,不承认判例制度.然而成文法的局限性导致大量法律解释的出现,但仅凭法律解释是不能解决成文法所固有缺陷的.纵观
China is the mainland legal system country,in the present law origin,take the written law as the main law origin,does not acknowledge the legal precedent system.However the written law limitation causes the massive legal explanation the appearance,but only depends on the legal explanation is cannot solve the written law inherent flaw.Looked over our country history,the legal precedent also once was the legal origin.The statute book and the legal precedent,take the western two big legal systems the representative characteristic,in recent years but day by day fused along with the world economics contact expansion.This article through the comparison written law and the legal precedent respective length,proposed in this foundation two fusions necessities,and on our country present stage whether briefly introduced several questions which the legal precedent as well as in the introduction legal precedent system process should pay attention to discuss own view

China is a civil law countries, the sources of law in China, as the main source of law to statutory law, does not recognize the system of jurisprudence. However statutory limitations led to the emerge...

全部展开

China is a civil law countries, the sources of law in China, as the main source of law to statutory law, does not recognize the system of jurisprudence. However statutory limitations led to the emergence of a large number of legal interpretation, but the interpretation of laws alone can not solve the inherent error of law. Throughout our history, the case has legal sources. Code and jurisprudence, as the representative of Western Liangdafaxi characteristics of the world economy in recent years with the expansion of exchanges and increasingly integration. All through the length of their respective comparative law and jurisprudence, both made on the basis of the need for integration, and whether our current system of jurisprudence and the jurisprudence of the process should be of concern to a few brief questions about my own views.

收起