请各位高手解析一道新GRE逻辑题Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Each year every employee of SAI Corporation must enroll in one of the two health insurance plans offered by SAI.One plan requires a sizable m
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2024/11/27 16:47:41
请各位高手解析一道新GRE逻辑题Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Each year every employee of SAI Corporation must enroll in one of the two health insurance plans offered by SAI.One plan requires a sizable m
请各位高手解析一道新GRE逻辑题
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Each year every employee of SAI Corporation must enroll in one of the two health insurance plans offered by SAI.One plan requires a sizable monetary contribution from employees; the other plan is paid for entirely by SAI.Many SAI employees enroll in the plan requiring employee contributions.This fact does not show that they feel that this plan’s benefits are superior to those provided by the plan requiring no employee contribution since----.
(A) the plan that requires an employee contribution costs and enrolled employee significantly less per year than do typical health insurance plans offered by corporations other than SAI
(B) only SAI employees who have worked for SAI for at least fifteen years are eligible to enroll in the plan paid for entirely by SAI
(C) the two health insurance plans currently offered by SAI are substantially the same plans SAI has offered for the past ten years
(D) most of the SAI employees enrolled in the plan paid for entirely by SAI are under 50 years old
(E) both plans offered by SAI provide benefits not only for employees of SAI but also for children and spouses of enrolled employees为何不选C选B?请赐教!
懂了懂了!原来我只纠结在最后一句而忽略了上下文!受益匪浅!
请各位高手解析一道新GRE逻辑题Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?Each year every employee of SAI Corporation must enroll in one of the two health insurance plans offered by SAI.One plan requires a sizable m
人们选择"requiring employee contributions" plan “而不是 “no employee contribution”plan,并不是因为"requiring employee contributions" plan比“no employee contribution”plan 好,而是因为:
所以空里应填第一个 plan不比第二个 plan更好,但人们却又不得不选第一个的原因.B选项说了,是因为不到十五年的工作时间,人们即使想选第二个plan也选不了.这个符合逻辑,所以可以选.
C说两个plans 和十年前没啥变化体现不出人们为啥要选不好的第一个plan
每年每个员工必须登记到两个医保系统之一: 一个员工集体出钱的 一个完全由公司出钱的
按常理说 应该是员工不愿意自己出钱的 也就是说没有其他条件下 大多数员工应该选择第二个系统 但是题中现实情况是 很多员工却是选择了前一个系统 然后问题来了:这个现象并不能说明““员工们感觉第一个系统比第二个系统更有利于员工””因为_________
解析:第二系统多好啊 自己不用出钱...
全部展开
每年每个员工必须登记到两个医保系统之一: 一个员工集体出钱的 一个完全由公司出钱的
按常理说 应该是员工不愿意自己出钱的 也就是说没有其他条件下 大多数员工应该选择第二个系统 但是题中现实情况是 很多员工却是选择了前一个系统 然后问题来了:这个现象并不能说明““员工们感觉第一个系统比第二个系统更有利于员工””因为_________
解析:第二系统多好啊 自己不用出钱完全享受公司的医保多爽 按常理来说 员工自己肯定不愿意自己出钱 但是他们很多人却选择了自己出钱的 为什么呢 这就要选项来加一个原因了 有了选项的这个原因 员工的做法才会正常 所以我们要选择一个选项 这个选项表达的意思正好支持员工的做法。下面看选项:
A系统一每年要求员工出钱比系统二少
分析:显然不是最充分的条件 第二系统还不要员工钱呢 怎么会比第二系统少呢 pass掉
B只有工作超过15年以上的才可以享受第二系统
分析:这是个可以解释通的理由 现在我们国家不就是这么规定的吗 只有工龄多少年以上就可以享受各种保险 医保 退休金什么的 可以暂时考虑选它
C这两个系统在本质上和过去十年都一直实行的哪些系统一样
分析:根本不能解释引号中的话 过去实行的怎么了 本质上一样怎么了 员工们可以照样选择第二系统 只是他们没有选择 说明可能有什么限制条件制约他们 这也正是B选项里说明的 所以pass掉
D不用解释了吧
收起