英语翻译Education Must Be A Priority Australians,whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners,have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.Perhaps those early values are still reflect

英语翻译Education Must Be A Priority Australians,whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners,have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.Perhaps those early values are still reflect
英语翻译
Education Must Be A Priority Australians,whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners,have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.
Perhaps those early values are still reflected in our governments’ spending priorities.According to an OECD report,Australia spends less on education (primary,secondary and tertiary) than most other Western countries.Canada,the United States,France and Sweden – the kind of countries we like to compare ourselves to – devote a higher proportion of their gross domestic product to education than we do,even through we have a higher proportion of school age children.Though it might be expected that we would spend more on education because of our younger population,Australia,with 24 per cent more children,spends about 10 per cent less on education than the group’s average.We also lag well behind most other OECD countries in the proportion of students remaining at school past the mandatory age.
World Bank studies of the causes of development have concluded that education is the single most important factor in ensuring a high standard of living for a country and its individuals.That being so,the OECD findings are cause for concern.Admittedly,the report is based on 1986 –87 figures,and since then there has been a very significant improvement in the school retention rate and a slight improvement in education funding.But the relatively low priority still accorded to education on Australia’s spending list indicates a remarkable short-sightedness.

英语翻译Education Must Be A Priority Australians,whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners,have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.Perhaps those early values are still reflect
题目：《教育必优先》
现在的舒适生活绝大程度上建立在农民和矿工的纯体力劳动上的澳大利亚人,传统上并未特别重视过正式教育.
或许这些早期的价值观仍体现在我们政府的财政支出优先顺序上.根据一份来自OECD(经济合作与发展组织)的报告,澳大利亚话费少于大多西方国家的经费于教育之上（这些教育包括初等、中等和高等教育）.加拿大、美国、法国和瑞典,那些我们经常拿来与自己比较的国家,尽管我们有更多的学龄儿童比例,但上述国家却均投入了更多的GDP比例于教育事业之中.尽管由于更大数量的年轻人口,有着百分之24的学龄儿童,却花费了少于美加法瑞四国平均投入比10%的投入.我们相比多也落后于OECD其他加入国对已超过义务教育年龄却仍在接受教育的学生的财政投入.
世界银行关于发展的起因的报告总结说,教育,是能够保障一个国家和他的居民高生活质量的最重要的因素,没有之一.这就意味着,OECD这一调查报告（指澳大利亚教育投入少的报告）着实令人担忧.不可否认地,虽然该报告基于1986-87年的数据撰写,而且自那以后澳大利亚在持续学习率上有着明显的提高,并在教育基金投入上有些略微进步.但是,在财政预算上对教育仍相对的低投入优先度,仍然体现着澳大利亚政府的不折不扣的目光短浅.
（文章不难,应该是高考难度的样子.
完全手打,仍有疑问可追问.看到那些在楼主已经强调不要机器翻译却仍煞有介事装模作样企图不劳而获甚至一段一段机器翻译装模作样的人,心里一阵捉急.）

教育必须优先考虑澳大利亚，其目前的舒适性主要建立由纯粹的体力劳动的农民和矿工，没有传统上是一个高价值的正规教育。
也许这些早期的值仍然反映在我们的政府开支的优先次序。根据经济合作与发展组织的报告，澳大利亚教育（小学，中学和高等教育），比大多数其他西方国家花费更少。加拿大，美国，法国和瑞典 - 那种我们喜欢拿自己的国家 - 比我们的教育投入其国内生产总值（GDP）的比例较高，甚至可以通...

全部展开

教育必须优先考虑澳大利亚，其目前的舒适性主要建立由纯粹的体力劳动的农民和矿工，没有传统上是一个高价值的正规教育。
也许这些早期的值仍然反映在我们的政府开支的优先次序。根据经济合作与发展组织的报告，澳大利亚教育（小学，中学和高等教育），比大多数其他西方国家花费更少。加拿大，美国，法国和瑞典 - 那种我们喜欢拿自己的国家 - 比我们的教育投入其国内生产总值（GDP）的比例较高，甚至可以通过我们的适龄儿童有较高的比例。虽然可以预计，我们会花更多的教育，因为我们的年轻人口，澳大利亚，其中24％多的儿童，约10％的教育组的平均花费。我们还远远落后其他大多数经合组织国家的学生留在学校的比例超过法定退休年龄。
世界银行的研究得出的结论是，教育是最重要的因素，以确保高标准的生活，一个国家和个人发展的原因。正因为如此，经济合作与发展组织的调查结果令人担忧。诚然，该报告是根据1986 -87的数字，并从那时起一直是学校的保留率和教育经费略有改善非常显着的改善。但仍然在澳大利亚的消费清单上给予教育的优先级比较低，表示一个显着的短视。

收起

Education Must Be A Priority Australians, whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners, have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.

全部展开

Education Must Be A Priority Australians, whose present comfort was built largely by the sheer physical labor of farmers and miners, have not traditionally placed a high value on formal education.
教育必须是一个优先级的澳大利亚人,他的礼物安慰建成,主要是由纯粹的体力劳动的农民和矿工,没有传统上放置一个高价值在正式教育。
Perhaps those early values are still reflected in our governments’ spending priorities.
也许那些早期的值仍然反映在我们的政府支出优先级。
According to an OECD report, Australia spends less on education (primary, secondary and tertiary) than most other Western countries.
根据经合组织的一项报告,澳大利亚花更少的教育(初级、二级和三级)比大多数其他西方国家。
Canada, the United States, France and Sweden – the kind of countries we like to compare ourselves to – devote a higher proportion of their gross domestic product to education than we do, even through we have a higher proportion of school age children.
加拿大、美国、法国和瑞典这样的国家我们喜欢将自己——把一个更高的比例的国内生产总值,教育比我们,甚至通过我们有更高比例的学龄儿童。
Though it might be expected that we would spend more on education because of our younger population, Australia, with 24 per cent more children, spends about 10 per cent less on education than the group’s average.
尽管它会期望我们将花上更多的教育,因为我们的年轻人口,澳大利亚,超过24%的孩子,在教育上的花费大约少10%比该组织的平均水平。
We also lag well behind most other OECD countries in the proportion of students remaining at school past the mandatory age.
我们还远远滞后于其他大多数经合组织成员国中比例的学生留在学校过去的强制的年龄。
World Bank studies of the causes of development have concluded that education is the single most important factor in ensuring a high standard of living for a country and its individuals.
世界银行的研究发展的原因得出结论,教育是最重要的因素在确保高水准的生活对一个国家和它的个人。
That being so, the OECD findings are cause for concern.
所以,经合组织发现引起关注。
Admittedly, the report is based on 1986 –87 figures, and since then there has been a very significant improvement in the school retention rate and a slight improvement in education funding.
诚然,这份报告是基于1986年-87年的数据,自那以来,已经有一个非常显著的改善学校保留率和一个轻微的改善教育资金。
But the relatively low priority still accorded to education on Australia’s spending list indicates a remarkable short-sightedness.
但相对较低的优先级仍然给予教育在澳大利亚的消费列表显示一个非凡的短视。

我在做任务 ， 请采纳为最佳， 谢谢！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

收起