英语翻译Our results provide a strong caution against the idea that one may use limited and temporary interventions to select equilibria with large and permanent effects on city development.We confirm on population and city-aggregate manufacturing
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2025/02/01 13:25:34
英语翻译Our results provide a strong caution against the idea that one may use limited and temporary interventions to select equilibria with large and permanent effects on city development.We confirm on population and city-aggregate manufacturing
英语翻译
Our results provide a strong caution against the idea that one may use limited and temporary interventions to select equilibria with large and permanent effects on city development.We confirm on population and city-aggregate manufacturing data that such aggregate measures of activity in cities are highly robust to temporary shocks even of immense size.Perhaps this is not so surprising given that natural geographic features may have a very strong influence on aggregate activity (Rappaport and Sachs,2001).However,it is much harder to believe that these visible features of geography impose the same direct constraints on the size of individual industries.Here,the theory of multiple equilibria should emerge in full force.The fact that cities have a very strong tendency to return not only to the prior level of manufacturing activity but also to recover the specific industries that previously thrived there even in the aftermath of overwhelming destruction is very strong evidence that temporary interventions of economically relevant magnitude are extremely unlikely to al- ter the course of aggregate manufacturing or even to strongly affect industrial structure in a given locale.Small and temporary interventions to reap large and permanent changes in levels and composition of regional economic activity is an idea that does not find support in the data.
英语翻译Our results provide a strong caution against the idea that one may use limited and temporary interventions to select equilibria with large and permanent effects on city development.We confirm on population and city-aggregate manufacturing
我们得出的结果给想用有限和短暂的干涉给城市的发展制造出一个深远和永久影响的人提出一个警惕. 我们得出的结果给想用有限和短暂的干涉给城市的发展制造出一个深远和永久影响的人提出一个警惕. 我们确认人口数量和向城市聚集的产业数据,这种聚集的方式在城市里会引起一个短暂但是很强烈的冲击.考虑到大自然的地理特性可能会对这种聚集行为会有一个很强烈的影响,所以这可能不是那么令人吃惊(Rappaport and Sachs,2001).但是,让人相信这些明显的地理特征能对每个产业的规模产生直接的约束是很难的.在这里,多重平衡的理论应该发挥充分的威力.但是事实是,城市不仅有对产业向前发展的趋势,而且同样有使某个以前兴盛的产业在遭受毁灭之灾后重新恢复元气的能力.这些都强有力的表明,对经济上的一些不稳定的短暂的干预行为对产业聚集的过程或者想在一个特定的场所对产业结构产生实质性变化是极其不可能的.想要用少量和短暂的干预在层次和地域经济的构成上取得大量而且永久实质上的变化的想法在理论上目前还没有找到可信的依据.
啊.真的很难,是我目前的极限了,上班到现在就翻译了你这一段话,看似简单,翻起来实则不容易啊 .呵呵.纯粹手翻,大概意思出来了.一些可能是专业上的意思,所以不是很熟悉.