英语翻译自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权

英语翻译自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权
英语翻译
自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,
我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权做出规定.然而公司出现僵局,大股东滥用资本,股东利益持续受损而无法解除等情况时常出现.中小股东的利益受到严重侵害时,由于立法的空白,导致中小股东权利不能得到救济.2006年起实施的新《公司法》第183条规定：“公司经营管理发生严重困难,继续存续会使股东利益受到重大损失,通过其他途径不能解决的,持有公司全部股东表决权百分之十以上的股东,可以请求人民法院解散公司.”这一规定首次确定了我国股东解散公司的诉权,为中小股东的权利保护提供了法律依据,是我国公司法立法上的重大突破.然而,这一规定显得原则化了,在实际司法操作中会遇到很多问题.比如：立案审查的条件,当事人诉讼主体资格的确认,公司经营管理发生严重困难的认定等.本文以解散公司诉权在司法实践中存在的问题以及立法完善为中心,在研究股东解散公司诉权时,分析我国立法状况,借鉴国外股东解散公司诉权保护的规定及实践,对我国解散公司诉权的问题进行探讨,以期为司法实践提供点参考.
使用在线翻译的朋友请绕开！

英语翻译自己翻译了一下,总觉得有些地方翻译的不好,自己译的就不发上来了……请大家帮忙翻译下,我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权
我国《公司法》于1993年颁布,由于历史和现实原因,当时的公司法并未对股东解散公司诉权做出规定.然而公司出现僵局,大股东滥用资本,股东利益持续受损而无法解除等情况时常出现.中小股东中小股东的利益受到严重侵害时,由于立法的空白,导致中小股东权利不能得到救济
Our country’s ‘Company Act’ was promulgated in 1993,but at that time,due to historical and practical reasons,it did not specify the petition rights of shareholders to dissolve a company.So the incidents of companies reaching impasse,major shareholders abusing the use of capitals and shareholders’ interests suffering continuous losses had happened from time to time.When the interests of small and medium shareholders had sustained grave losses,they had no place to seek redress due to the lack of protective legislations.
2006年起实施的新《公司法》第183条规定：“公司经营管理发生严重困难,继续存续会使股东利益受到重大损失,通过其他途径不能解决的,持有公司全部股东表决权百分之十以上的股东,可以请求人民法院解散公司.”这一规定首次确定了我国股东解散公司的诉权,为中小股东的权利保护提供了法律依据,是我国公司法立法上的重大突破.然而,这一规定显得原则化了,在实际司法操作中会遇到很多问题.比如：立案审查的条件,当事人诉讼主体资格的确认,公司经营管理发生严重困难的认定等.
Clause 138 of the new ‘Company Act’ enacted in 2006 stipulates:‘In the event of the operating management of a company is suffering from serious difficulties,the continuous maintenance of its exixstence will incur heavy losses to the shareholders and all solution avenues had been exhausted,the shareholders holding more than 10% of the company’s total voting shares can petition for the dissolution of the company in a people’s court.’.This regulation for the first time ensures the petition rights of shareholders in our country to disolve a company,it offers legislative authority for the protection of the rights of small and medium shareholders and this is a breakthrough on the legislations of our country’s ‘Company Act’.However,this regulation appears to be in principle only,it will encounter many problems in actual judiciary operating procedures.For examples,the conditions required to place the case on file,the recognition on the qualification of the litigants,the determination on the existence of serious difficulties in the operating management of the company,etc.
本文以解散公司诉权在司法实践中存在的问题以及立法完善为中心,在研究股东解散公司诉权时,分析我国立法状况,借鉴国外股东解散公司诉权保护的规定及实践,对我国解散公司诉权的问题进行探讨,以期为司法实践提供点参考.
This thesis analyses the legislation situation in our country by attaching its emphasis on the existing problems in juridical practice during litigation of a company dissolution,and by referring to the regulations and actual applications from abroad in the protection of shareholders’ petition rights to dissolve a company in our country,it discusses the relevant problems with the objective of offering some references to juridical practice.

Our country "Law of corporation" promulgated in 1993, because the history and the realistic reason, law of corporation then has not dismissed the company right of suit to the shareholder to make the s...

全部展开

Our country "Law of corporation" promulgated in 1993, because the history and the realistic reason, law of corporation then has not dismissed the company right of suit to the shareholder to make the stipulation. However the company presents the deadlock, the major stockholder abuses the capital, the shareholder benefit continues to suffer injury is unable to relieve and so on situations often to appear. When the young shareholder's benefit receives the serious violation, because legislates the blank, causes the young stockholder's right not to be able to obtain the relief. in 2006 implements new "Law of corporation" the 183rd stipulation: “the company management and operation has the serious difficulty, will continue to last will cause the shareholder benefit to have the heavy loss, cannot solve through other ways, will have the company complete shareholder right to vote 10% above shareholders, may request that the People's court will dissolve the company.”This stipulation had determined for the first time our country shareholders dismiss company's right of suit, has provided the legal basis for the young shareholder's right protection, is in our country law of corporation legislation important breakthrough. However, this stipulation appeared the principle has melted, will meet many questions in the actual judicial operation. For instance: Puts on record the condition which examines, the litigant lawsuit main body qualifications' confirmation, the company management and operation has the serious difficulty to recognize and so on. This article take dismisses the company right of suit the question which as well as the legislative consummation exists in the judicial practice as a center, when studies the shareholder dismisses the company right of suit, analyzes our country to legislate the condition, profits from the overseas shareholder to dismiss the company right of suit protection the stipulation and the practice, dismisses the company right of suit to our country the question to carry on the discussion, provides a reference take the time as the judicial practice.

收起

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However th...

全部展开

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However the company appear logjam, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder benefits keep on damaged but can't the relief's etc.'s circumstance often appear.Medium the benefits of small shareholder be subjected to severity violate, cause because of the blank of the lawmaking medium the small shareholder right can't get succour.2006 since implement of new 《company law 》 183 regulation rule settle:"Company management management occurrence severity difficulty, continue to save continuous will make the shareholder benefits be subjected to graveness loss, pass the other path can't solve of, hold to have a company all shareholder right to vote the shareholder of above 10%, can claim the court of the people dismiss a company."This provision first time assurance our country the shareholder dismiss tell of company power, for medium small shareholder of right protection provided law basis, is our country the graveness of the company law lawmaking break.However, this the provision seemed to be a principle to turn, at actual judicatory in operation will meet a lot of problem.For example:The condition register for the record reviewing, the corpus qualifications of the party concerned litigation really recognize, company management management occurrence severity difficulty of affirm etc..This text with dismiss a company to tell power in the judicatory the fulfillment existence of problem and lawmaking be perfect for center, at research the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power, analysis our country lawmaking condition, draw lessons from abroad the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power protection of provision and practice, to our country dismiss the problem that the company tell power to carry on study, take period as judicatory practice provide point reference.

收起

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However th...

全部展开

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However the company appear logjam, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder benefits keep on damaged but can't the relief's etc.'s circumstance often appear.Medium the benefits of small shareholder be subjected to severity violate, cause because of the blank of the lawmaking medium the small shareholder right can't get succour.2006 since implement of new 《company law 》 183 regulation rule settle:"Company management management occurrence severity difficulty, continue to save continuous will make the shareholder benefits be subjected to graveness loss, pass the other path can't solve of, hold to have a company all shareholder right to vote the shareholder of above 10%, can claim the court of the people dismiss a company."This provision first time assurance our country the shareholder dismiss tell of company power, for medium small shareholder of right protection provided law basis, is our country the graveness of the company law lawmaking break.However, this the provision

收起

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However th...

全部展开

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However the company appear logjam, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder benefits keep on damaged but can't the relief's etc.'s circumstance often appear.Medium the benefits of small shareholder be subjected to severity violate, cause because of the blank of the lawmaking medium the small shareholder right can't get succour.2006 since implement of new 《company law 》 183 regulation rule settle:"Company management management occurrence severity difficulty, continue to save continuous will make the shareholder benefits be subjected to graveness loss, pass the other path can't solve of, hold to have a company all shareholder right to vote the shareholder of above 10%, can claim the court of the people dismiss a company."This provision first time assurance our country the shareholder dismiss tell of company power, for medium small shareholder of right protection provided law basis, is our country the graveness of the company law lawmaking break.However, this the provision seemed to be a principle to turn, at actual judicatory in operation will meet a lot of problem.For example:The condition register for the record reviewing, the corpus qualifications of the party concerned litigation really recognize, company management management occurrence severity difficulty of affirm etc..This text with dismiss a company to tell power in the judicatory the fulfillment existence of problem and lawmaking be perfect for center, at research the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power, analysis our country lawmaking condition, draw lessons from abroad the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power protection of provision and practice, to our country dismiss the problem that the company tell power to carry on study,

收起

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However th...

全部展开

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However the company appear logjam, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder benefits keep on damaged but can't the relief's etc.'s circumstance often appear.Medium the benefits of small shareholder be subjected to severity violate, cause because of the blank of the lawmaking medium the small shareholder right can't get succour.2006 since implement of new 《company law 》 183 regulation rule settle:"Company management management occurrence severity difficulty, continue to save continuous will make the shareholder benefits be subjected to graveness loss, pass the other path can't solve of, hold to have a company all shareholder right to vote the shareholder of above 10%, can claim the court of the people dismiss a company."This provision first time assurance our country the shareholder dismiss tell of company power, for medium small shareholder of right protection provided law basis, is our country the graveness of the company law lawmaking break.However, this the provision seemed to be a principle to turn, at actual judicatory in operation will meet a lot of problem.For example:The condition register for the record reviewing, the corpus qualifications of the party concerned litigation really recognize, company management management occurrence severity difficulty of affirm etc..This text with dismiss a company to tell power in the judicatory the fulfillment existence of problem and lawmaking be perfect for center, at research the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power, analysis our country lawmaking condition, draw lessons from abroad the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power protection of provision and practice, to our country dismiss the problem that the company tell power to carry on study, taat research the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power, analysis our country lawmaking condition, draw lessons from abroad the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power protection of provision and practice, to our country dismiss the problem that the company tell power to carry on study,
ke period as judicatory practice provide point reference.

收起

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However th...

全部展开

Our country 《company law 》in 1993 promulgation, because of history and reality reason, the company law at that time didn't dismiss a company to tell power to do provision to the shareholder.However the company appear logjam, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder benefits keep on damaged but can't the relief's etc.'s circumstance often appear.Medium the benefits of small shareholder be subjected to severity violate, cause because of the blank of the lawmaking medium the small shareholder right can't get succour.2006 since implement of new 《company law 》 183 regulation rule settle:"Company management management occurrence severity difficulty, continue to save continuous will make the shareholder benefits be subjected to graveness loss, pass the other path can't solve of, hold to have a company all shareholder right to vote the shareholder of above 10%, can claim the court of the people dismiss a company."This provision first time assurance our country the shareholder dismiss tell of company power, for medium small shareholder of right protection provided law basis, is our country the graveness of the company law lawmaking break.However, this the provision seemed to be a principle to turn, at actual judicatory in operation will meet a lot of problem.For example:The condition register for the record reviewing, the corpus qualifications of the party concerned litigation really recognize, company management management occurrence severity difficulty of affirm etc..This text with dismiss a company to tell power in the judicatory the fulfillment existence of problem and lawmaking be perfect for center, at research the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power, analysis our country lawmaking condition, draw lessons from abroad the shareholder dismiss a company to tell power protection of provision and practice, to our country dismiss the problem that the company tell power to carry on study, take period as judicatory practice provide point reference.
(应该就是这样了.你参考下吧)

收起

Our country "Law of corporation" promulgated in 1993, because the history and the realistic reason, law of corporation then has not dismissed the company right of suit to the shareholder to make the s...

全部展开

Our country "Law of corporation" promulgated in 1993, because the history and the realistic reason, law of corporation then has not dismissed the company right of suit to the shareholder to make the stipulation. However the company presents the deadlock, the major stockholder abuses the capital, the shareholder benefit continues to suffer injury is unable to relieve and so on situations often to appear. When the young shareholder's benefit receives the serious violation, because legislates the blank, causes the young stockholder's right not to be able to obtain the relief. in 2006 implements new "Law of corporation" the 183rd stipulation: “the company management and operation has the serious difficulty, will continue to last will cause the shareholder benefit to have the heavy loss, cannot solve through other ways, will have the company complete shareholder right to vote 10% above shareholders, may request that the People's court will dissolve the company.”This stipulation had determined for the first time our country shareholders dismiss company's right of suit, has provided the legal basis for the young shareholder's right protection, is in our country law of corporation legislation important breakthrough. However, this stipulation appeared the principle has melted, will meet many questions in the actual judicial operation. For instance: Puts on record the condition which examines, the litigant lawsuit main body qualifications' confirmation, the company management and operation has the serious difficulty to recognize and so on. This article take dismisses the company right of suit the question which as well as the legislative consummation exists in the judicial practice as a center, when studies the shareholder dismisses the company right of suit, analyzes our country to legislate the condition, profits from the overseas shareholder to dismiss the company right of suit protection the stipulation and the practice, dismisses the company right of suit to our country the question to carry on the discussion, provides a reference take the time as the judicial practice. the question supplemented: Uses the online translation the friend please go round!

收起

Our country " company law " issue on 1993, because of historical and realistic reason, at that time company law dismiss to shareholder company tell right make the regulation. But company appear deadlo...

全部展开

Our country " company law " issue on 1993, because of historical and realistic reason, at that time company law dismiss to shareholder company tell right make the regulation. But company appear deadlock, big shareholder abuse capital, shareholder interests continuously damaged unable to relieve situation appear often. When the benefit of the minority stock holder in China is encroached on seriously, the blank legislating, minority stock holder's right can't be relieved in leading to the fact. Article 183 of new " company law " implemented from 2006 stipulates: "Company it is serious and difficult for management and administration to take place, continue, deposit, continue, can make shareholder interests incur great losses, can't be solved thr