英语翻译In this special issue,we have five articles addressing different aspects of animalsand law,both in the West and the East,from different perspectives.First,we havethe paper ‘Liability for Animals:An Historico-Structural Comparison’ by

英语翻译In this special issue,we have five articles addressing different aspects of animalsand law,both in the West and the East,from different perspectives.First,we havethe paper ‘Liability for Animals:An Historico-Structural Comparison’ by
英语翻译
In this special issue,we have five articles addressing different aspects of animals
and law,both in the West and the East,from different perspectives.First,we have
the paper ‘Liability for Animals:An Historico-Structural Comparison’ by Professor
Bernard S.Jackson.Professor Jackson provides us with an erudite and detailed
account of civil liability for animals in a range of ancient,mediaeval and modern
legal systems,using semiotic analysis to supplement the insights of conventional
legal history,and balancing diachronic and synchronic approaches.His paper goes
into great detail in the Jewish and Roman sources but provides new semiotic
insights into the most famous animal,the goring ox,in Western law,and the law
associated with it.
In the next article,‘Zoologian Jurisprudence’ by Piyel Haldar examines the
iconography and role of animals in medieval and early modern bestiaries.Haldar
describes that in being without original sin,‘God’s creatures’ were deemed
proximate to divine perfection and to salvation.The paper argues that animals,
whether symbolic or actual,both instructed man’s moral behaviour and ushered man
towards salvation,thus,it is argued,animals are key to understanding how modern
law may eventually co-ordinate itself in relation to the concept of a future salvic
moment.

英语翻译In this special issue,we have five articles addressing different aspects of animalsand law,both in the West and the East,from different perspectives.First,we havethe paper ‘Liability for Animals:An Historico-Structural Comparison’ by
你加高分把,100分,我帮你翻

在这个特殊的问题，我们有五条处理不同方面的动物
和法律，无论在西方和东方，从不同的角度。首先，我们有
本文的责任：一个比较的动物historico-structural教授
伯纳德·杰克逊。杰克逊教授为我们提供了一个博学和详细
考虑民事责任是动物的一系列古代，中世纪和现代
法律系统，用符号学的分析补充见解传统
法律史，和平衡的历时性与共时性的方法。他...

全部展开

在这个特殊的问题，我们有五条处理不同方面的动物
和法律，无论在西方和东方，从不同的角度。首先，我们有
本文的责任：一个比较的动物historico-structural教授
伯纳德·杰克逊。杰克逊教授为我们提供了一个博学和详细
考虑民事责任是动物的一系列古代，中世纪和现代
法律系统，用符号学的分析补充见解传统
法律史，和平衡的历时性与共时性的方法。他的论文
进入详细的犹太人和罗马人的来源，但提供了新的符号
深入了解最著名的动物，这家牛，在西方法律，与法律
与之相关的。
在接下来的文章中，“法理学”zoologian皮耶尔·哈尔达检查
意象和作用的动物在中世纪和近代早期动物寓言集。哈尔达
介绍在无原罪，“上帝的动物被认为
接近神圣的完善和救赎。本文认为，动物，
无论是象征性的或实际的，指示人的道德行为都和男人
对救恩，因此，有人认为，动物的关键是如何理解现代
法律可能最终协调本身有关的概念，一个未来的salvic
时刻。

收起

moonbring | 一级 是机器翻译的，不准，不要采纳！

做了重要修改，不要错过哟
In this special issue, we have five articles addressing different aspects of animals and law, both in the West and the East, from different perspectives.
在这一特殊的问题上，可以从东西方找到五篇涉及动物...

全部展开

做了重要修改，不要错过哟
In this special issue, we have five articles addressing different aspects of animals and law, both in the West and the East, from different perspectives.
在这一特殊的问题上，可以从东西方找到五篇涉及动物与法制方面的文章，并进行了多角度、全方位的阐述。
First, we have the paper ‘Liability for Animals: An Historico-Structural Comparison’ by Professor . Professor Jackson provides us with an erudite and detailed account of civil liability for animals in a range of ancient, mediaeval and modern legal systems, using semiotic analysis to supplement the insights of conventional legal history, and balancing diachronic and synchronic approaches.
第一篇文章由伯纳德 · 杰克逊教授执笔，题目是“动物的作用：历史演变对比”。关于对动物的作用，杰克逊教授采用符号分析法来弥补传统法制史理论的不足，并根据时代变化对古代、 中世纪和近代有关法律制度进行了了同步分析并做了详细的解释。
His paper goes into great detail in the Jewish and Roman sources but provides new semiotic
insights into the most famous animal, the goring ox, in Western law, and the law associated with it.
该文从犹太和罗马的起源开始就进行了深入的探讨，并在西方法制中率先提出了与著名动物 goring ox 有关的符号分析学观点。
In the next article, ‘Zoologian Jurisprudence’ by Piyel Haldar examines the iconography and role of animals in medieval and early modern bestiaries.
下一篇文章是由皮耶.哈尔达尔撰写的，题目是“动物学之启迪”。在文中，对中世纪和近代早期动物寓言故事中的插图以及动物所起的作用进行了研究。
Haldar describes that in being without original sin, ‘God’s creatures’ were deemed proximate to divine perfection and to salvation.
哈尔达尔在文中写道，如果不存在原罪，“上帝创造的动物”被认为是完美和善于避祸的。
The paper argues that animals, whether symbolic or actual, both instructed man’s moral behaviour and ushered man towards salvation, thus, it is argued, animals are key to understanding how modern law may eventually co-ordinate itself in relation to the concept of a future salvic moment.
该文认为，无论是起着象征作用和还是起着实际作用，动物对人类的道德行为都给予了启示和指导，并引领人类走向未来。文章就此得出结论认为，动物是理解现代法制在未来危急时刻如何最终自我调整的关键。
终于翻译完成了，希望能够帮到你哟

收起