写了篇作文,请高手挑挑错.感激不尽!The victims always play the most essential role in cases. But the truth of memories of witness always make polices and juries headache. If the witnesses prove perjury on purpose, juries may check out wi
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:六六作业网 时间:2025/01/19 02:17:04
写了篇作文,请高手挑挑错.感激不尽!The victims always play the most essential role in cases. But the truth of memories of witness always make polices and juries headache. If the witnesses prove perjury on purpose, juries may check out wi
写了篇作文,请高手挑挑错.感激不尽!
The victims always play the most essential role in cases. But the truth of memories of witness always make polices and juries headache. If the witnesses prove perjury on purpose, juries may check out with lie detector. However, the witnesses’ do not lie and there are something wrong with their memory, which makes cases more confuse and innocent people will be put into jail falsely. How to recognize a false memory is a good issue to think.
Let’s we talk about children and old people firstly. Recently, whether oldsters and children’ witnesses are accurate or false is a hotspot. Ceci and Maggie Bruck’s experiments showed that children’ memory are easy be mold. So the children witnesses might be misled by someone with evil purposes. In the other part children are very is being misled on questionnaires. Then many toddlers tend to answer “yes” in true-false questions. But children’s witness is impossible to abolish at all. In order to keep the accurate of envidences, most cases receive children’s evidence carefully, while choose more multi-choose items and easy-understand words to ask to children. Old victims also have been suspected. Some scientists support that most old witnesses’s lack of good memory, and they may hard to find some details in cases. The most important thing in a case is details. But another scientists thinks that old witness own more experiments than younger people, they have their judgment. In my opinion, we should not give up old victims unless they too old to thinking. Old victims will be constructive on detecting.
However, we face adults in most situations. Reconstruction of memory is one of big rehearing killers, for instant: misinformation. People mix up false information in their memory, may because past experiments or they just saw a movies over times. The context of movies and experiments may insert into their memory. Juries are hard to judge when they address these situations. So, we made more seriously standards of pick witnesses and query sheets. The juries have to choose a witness who didn’t witness case in a clear visual environment very carefully. And the questionnaires cannot contain any guiding question.
In summary, we only able to avoid false memories now to some extent . To recognize false memories still need more evidences and techniques.
写了篇作文,请高手挑挑错.感激不尽!The victims always play the most essential role in cases. But the truth of memories of witness always make polices and juries headache. If the witnesses prove perjury on purpose, juries may check out wi
The victims always play the mostessential role in cases.But the truth of memories of witness always make(s) polices and juries headache(s).If the witnesses prove
perjury on purpose,juries may check out with liar detector.However,the witness(es) do not lie and there( is) something wrong with
their memory,which makes cases more confus(ing) and innocent people will be put into jail falsely.How
to recognize a false memory is a good (question) to think (about).
Let’s (we)(delete)
talk about children and old people firstly(delete).Recently,whether( the
olds ) and children’ witnesses are( true )or false is a
hotspot.Ceci and Maggie Bruck’s experiments showed that children’ memory are
easy be mold.So the children(’s) witnesses might be misled by someone with evil purposes.
In the other part children are (very easy to be)
misled ( by) questionnaires.Then many toddlers tend to answer “yes”
in true-false questions.But children’s witness is impossible to abolish at
all.In order to keep the (accuracy) of (evidences,most cases receive)(delete) children’s evidence(s) (were analyzed) carefully( in most cases),while( making more specific multiple
choices and avoiding question wording problems to prevent
response bias).Old victims also have been
suspected( on the accuracy of samples).Some scientists support that most (of the) old witnesses’ (are )lack of good
memory,and they may( be) hard to find some details in cases.The most important
thing in a case is (the) detail(s)(delete).But another scientist(s)(delete) thinks that old
witness (experienced) more experiments than younger people,they have their
judgment.In my opinion,we should not give up old victims unless they( are) too old to (think about).Old victims
will be constructive on detecting.
However,(we face(delete) adults appear more frequently) in most situations.Reconstruction of memory is one of big rehearing
killers,for( instance):misinformation.People mix up false information in
their memory,( may)(delete) because (of) past experiments or they just saw (a)(delete) movies over
times.The context of movies and experiments may (be inserted) into their (memories).Juries are hard to
judge when they address these situations.So,we made (standards more serious on picking) witnesses and (querying) sheets.The juries have to choose a witness who didn’t
witness case in a clear visual environment very carefully.And the
questionnaires cannot contain any( biased word).
In summary,we (are) only able to avoid false memories now to some extent.To
recognize false memories still need(s) more evidences and techniques.
作文在哪?